|
|
#1
09-17-2007, 07:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Poker Tracker Question: stats
Hi guys;
so I finally picked up a version of poker tracker and had a few questions about some of the stats. so these are my old NL 25 stats over about 40K hands (well old meaning from about 3 - 4 weeks ago) and I have not included my NL 50 stats. How are these looking? I am not nearly as nitty at NL 50 but my results haven't been quite as good in terms of BB/100. anyway, sorry to make this so broad I am just looking for somewhat of a description of the stats and how I compare to the rest of you guys, who i got for the most of part lots of respect for. ty. VP$IP = 10.01 WON$WSF% = 31.85 BB/100 = 3.94 WENT TO SD% = 18.80 WON $ AT SD% = 60.63 PFR% = 6.05 PFAF = 1.41 FLOP AF = 3.43 TURN AF = 2.77 RIVER AF = 2.93 TOTAL AF = 1.87 again, sorry for the dry post but I'm just a bit confused about all this. thanks guys. 
|
|
#3
09-17-2007, 08:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poker Tracker Question: stats
People have their own style of play. I might play 16/10/3 and someone else plays 16/10/3 and our winrates be extremely different. Our position play and decisions for betting certain hands could be way different. Instead of worrying about how your stats pan out against other players, worry about how you can win (bet sizing, value, reads, and etc)
|
|
#4
09-17-2007, 08:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poker Tracker Question: stats
[ QUOTE ]
ask the_main for help he plays that nitty too [/ QUOTE ] FYP
|
|
#6
09-17-2007, 08:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poker Tracker Question: stats
[ QUOTE ]
anyway, sorry to make this so broad I am just looking for somewhat of a description of the stats and how I compare to the rest of you guys, who i got for the most of part lots of respect for. [/ QUOTE ] If OP had read this board for any amount of time he would have had to know the nit jokes would be coming out of the woodwork. Once I read the stats I knew bottomset would be one of the first on the list. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] And now the_main is dragged into this whole mess as well. Nice job OP.
|
|
#7
09-17-2007, 09:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poker Tracker Question: stats
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] anyway, sorry to make this so broad I am just looking for somewhat of a description of the stats and how I compare to the rest of you guys, who i got for the most of part lots of respect for. [/ QUOTE ] If OP had read this board for any amount of time he would have had to know the nit jokes would be coming out of the woodwork. Once I read the stats I knew bottomset would be one of the first on the list. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] And now the_main is dragged into this whole mess as well. Nice job OP. [/ QUOTE ] fwiw I just joke around in pointless threads like this, or in the NC thread
|
|
#10
09-17-2007, 09:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poker Tracker Question: stats
[ QUOTE ]
Hi guys; so I finally picked up a version of poker tracker and had a few questions about some of the stats. so these are my old NL 25 stats over about 40K hands (well old meaning from about 3 - 4 weeks ago) and I have not included my NL 50 stats. How are these looking? I am not nearly as nitty at NL 50 but my results haven't been quite as good in terms of BB/100. anyway, sorry to make this so broad I am just looking for somewhat of a description of the stats and how I compare to the rest of you guys, who i got for the most of part lots of respect for. ty. VP$IP = 10.01 WON$WSF% = 31.85 BB/100 = 3.94 WENT TO SD% = 18.80 WON $ AT SD% = 60.63 PFR% = 6.05 PFAF = 1.41 FLOP AF = 3.43 TURN AF = 2.77 RIVER AF = 2.93 TOTAL AF = 1.87 again, sorry for the dry post but I'm just a bit confused about all this. thanks guys. [/ QUOTE ] Your W$SD seems a little high. This means you might be folding a little too much on the end when you are ahead. (The higher your W$SD goes up, the fewer river bets you are calling without having a very good hand, therefore, you are losing value by picking off some bluffs, even if sometimes you call and lose DUCY?) Normal range is 50-58. Your total aggression factor seems a little low too. Normal range is between 2-3, so I wouldn't be too worried. There is a great post by Pokey about how to analyze PT stats, you should definitely check that out.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
