|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: How much do you make a year from Poker? | |||
| I lose money |
   
|
25 | 9.47% |
| even |
  
|
50 | 18.94% |
| 25k to 50k |
  
|
61 | 23.11% |
| 50k to 100k |
  
|
37 | 14.02% |
| 100k to 250k |
  
|
45 | 17.05% |
| over 250k |
  
|
46 | 17.42% |
| Voters: 264. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
09-14-2007, 11:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
suggestion for 2nd gen software
for poker tracker 2 and holdem manager-
the bb (big bet(2xbigblind)) as in ptbb/100, unit should just be bigblinds. "big bet" isnt ever used in nl. i understand the unit is arbitrary, just makes more sense to me to measure against the size of the big blind instead of measuring against twice the big blind. 
|
|
#3
09-16-2007, 10:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: suggestion for 2nd gen software
runhot,
You are aware that PT lets you choose "PTBB/100" or BB/100, correct? Look under the Ring Game Player Statistics, Preferences Tab. There in a check box in the Game Levels section that states "Treat 'BB' For NL/PL As Big Blind Amt.". I'm pretty sure that HM will also have something similar, if it doesn't already.
|
|
#5
09-16-2007, 11:45 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: suggestion for 2nd gen software
Right now, poker data statistical standards are like opinions, everyone has one. But I agree with you Phil, it would be nice to agree on a standard.
The problem as I see it is that PL/NL doesn't have a "Big Bet", due to the nature of the game. So I believe the PTBB/100 was/is an attempt to compare apples to apples. The problem is not really "my bb/100 is not equal to your bb/100". It's more that I'm talking PL/NL and you're talking Limit. And it gets really confusing when a player plays both Limit and PL/NL. Maybe we should start comparing (or speaking in terms of) BB/100 (Limit Big Bet/100) vs. NLBB/100 (No Limit Big Blind/100).
|
|
#6
09-16-2007, 11:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: suggestion for 2nd gen software
[ QUOTE ]
I'd love to see a standard though. Having two will be a huge pain in the butt on the forums. [/ QUOTE ] Agreed. I don't see a problem with understanding the difference between ptBB and bb, but it's a common problem so obviously needs to be fixed. Plain old bb/100 seems like the way to go, isn't comparing limit to NL/PL a smaller issue than the problem that it creates? There would obviously be a slightly confusing adjustment period for some, but I don't see another way.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
