#1
|
|||
|
|||
Full House HU NL50
Can we find a fold for real here? The guy is not a maniac and never done that before...
PokerStars Game #11962261768: Hold'em No Limit ($0.25/$0.50) - 2007/09/09 - 14:45:15 (ET) Table 'Athor V' 2-max Seat #2 is the button Seat 1: JacksorK5 ($46.25 in chips) Seat 2: CrAcK_N_CoKe ($25.65 in chips) CrAcK_N_CoKe: posts small blind $0.25 JacksorK5: posts big blind $0.50 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to CrAcK_N_CoKe [Kd 4d] CrAcK_N_CoKe: raises $1 to $1.50 JacksorK5: calls $1 *** FLOP *** [Td As Tc] JacksorK5: checks CrAcK_N_CoKe: checks *** TURN *** [Td As Tc] [Kh] JacksorK5: checks CrAcK_N_CoKe: checks *** RIVER *** [Td As Tc Kh] [Kc] JacksorK5: bets $44.75 and is all-in ... CrAcK_N_CoKe: calls $24.15 and is all-in *** SHOW DOWN *** JacksorK5: shows [Ah Ac] (a full house, Aces full of Kings) CrAcK_N_CoKe: mucks hand JacksorK5 collected $50.80 from pot *** SUMMARY *** Total pot $51.30 | Rake $0.50 Board [Td As Tc Kh Kc] Seat 1: JacksorK5 (big blind) showed [Ah Ac] and won ($50.80) with a full house, Aces full of Kings Seat 2: CrAcK_N_CoKe (button) (small blind) mucked [Kd 4d] Sick Game |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Full House HU NL50
don't include results with hands, taints the analysis, and don't say stuff like "can we find a fold" makes it simply seem like you lost and people will alter their analysis because of that.
As played, never, ever fold |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Full House HU NL50
Awkward hand to begin with, even stranger river bet. I dont think I could get away from that.
|
|
|