Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-31-2007, 03:42 PM
Jenno99 Jenno99 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sucking at $1/2
Posts: 137
Default Stats post: 100k hands and it turns out I suck.

100,000 hands since I got my new computer (consequently new PT database) and it appears I am a losing player.











Can you guys have a look at this please and identify any obvious leaks?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-31-2007, 03:51 PM
yourface yourface is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,457
Default Re: Stats post: 100k hands and it turns out I suck.

raise more from late position
win more showdowns
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-31-2007, 03:51 PM
mvoss mvoss is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: basically right
Posts: 1,767
Default Re: Stats post: 100k hands and it turns out I suck.

Man those are some uglt SD numbers. At first glance your AF by street looks a bit odd. You may be too aggressive on the flop + turn and too passive on the river. I think you're missing value bets on the river and you may be playing a bit too much raise/fold on the flop and turn.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-31-2007, 03:55 PM
ZOMG_RIGGED! ZOMG_RIGGED! is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Does this smell like Chloroform to you?
Posts: 1,268
Default Re: Stats post: 100k hands and it turns out I suck.

You lost with quads 4 times? o.O Run better plzkkthx
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-31-2007, 03:57 PM
Jenno99 Jenno99 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sucking at $1/2
Posts: 137
Default Re: Stats post: 100k hands and it turns out I suck.

[ QUOTE ]
Man those are some uglt SD numbers. At first glance your AF by street looks a bit odd. You may be too aggressive on the flop + turn and too passive on the river. I think you're missing value bets on the river and you may be playing a bit too much raise/fold on the flop and turn.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think missing river value bets is definitely a problem I have been having. I don't play a whole lot of raise/fold but I'm perhaps not calling enough on flop + turn.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-31-2007, 04:01 PM
Jenno99 Jenno99 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sucking at $1/2
Posts: 137
Default Re: Stats post: 100k hands and it turns out I suck.

[ QUOTE ]
You lost with quads 4 times? o.O Run better plzkkthx

[/ QUOTE ]

All these times the quads were on the board and I was outkicked.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-31-2007, 04:03 PM
ZOMG_RIGGED! ZOMG_RIGGED! is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Does this smell like Chloroform to you?
Posts: 1,268
Default Re: Stats post: 100k hands and it turns out I suck.

[ QUOTE ]
All these times the quads were on the board and I was outkicked.

[/ QUOTE ]

Damn. I was going to suggest you play more BBJ :-D
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-31-2007, 04:05 PM
milesdyson milesdyson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: trying to 363 u
Posts: 14,916
Default Re: Stats post: 100k hands and it turns out I suck.

w$wsf is low because you don't do much raising in late position.

even your sb and bb pfr stats are low. your bb pfr, for instance, should be at least around 10%. don't be afraid to raise QJs against a CO open limper and SB.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-31-2007, 04:30 PM
GrindingIt GrindingIt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: GrindingIt
Posts: 83
Default Re: Stats post: 100k hands and it turns out I suck.

For sure your river agression is very low. I used to notice this a lot with some players who played too agressive on early streets with garbage and then by the time they got to the river they knew they couldn't beat anything so they'd check/call the river cause they didn't know what else to do. You also go to showdown quite a bit so I don't know if you're really folding that much either. Not a horrible thing but don't start calling with a lot of hands you're folding. Just mix it up more and call a bit more with your good/mediocre hands. You have to think what your raise is accomplishing, even at 1/2 but especially higher. Are you just getting them to fold bluffs and keep calling/raising with better hands or are you getting value out of your raise. There's not much you can do but try and rethink what you are doing on all postflop streets and why you are raising or calling against a particular opponent.

The biggest thing I look at is you have more than a 10% difference between your pfr and vpip. That's a lot when you defend your blind so little (Steal and defend closer to 40 each would be much better BTW). Are you overlimping a ton or even open limping? As a default, I wouldn't limp unless 2 or more players in front of you have. Otherwise, you should play raise/fold preflop outside of the big blind for the most part.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-31-2007, 04:38 PM
Jenno99 Jenno99 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sucking at $1/2
Posts: 137
Default Re: Stats post: 100k hands and it turns out I suck.

[ QUOTE ]

The biggest thing I look at is you have more than a 10% difference between your pfr and vpip. That's a lot when you defend your blind so little (Steal and defend closer to 40 each would be much better BTW). Are you overlimping a ton or even open limping? As a default, I wouldn't limp unless 2 or more players in front of you have. Otherwise, you should play raise/fold preflop outside of the big blind for the most part.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thanks for the advice. I don't open limp but I will often limp things like small pairs with one limper in.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.