#1
|
|||
|
|||
Stats post: 100k hands and it turns out I suck.
100,000 hands since I got my new computer (consequently new PT database) and it appears I am a losing player.
Can you guys have a look at this please and identify any obvious leaks? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stats post: 100k hands and it turns out I suck.
raise more from late position
win more showdowns |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stats post: 100k hands and it turns out I suck.
Man those are some uglt SD numbers. At first glance your AF by street looks a bit odd. You may be too aggressive on the flop + turn and too passive on the river. I think you're missing value bets on the river and you may be playing a bit too much raise/fold on the flop and turn.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stats post: 100k hands and it turns out I suck.
You lost with quads 4 times? o.O Run better plzkkthx
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stats post: 100k hands and it turns out I suck.
[ QUOTE ]
Man those are some uglt SD numbers. At first glance your AF by street looks a bit odd. You may be too aggressive on the flop + turn and too passive on the river. I think you're missing value bets on the river and you may be playing a bit too much raise/fold on the flop and turn. [/ QUOTE ] I think missing river value bets is definitely a problem I have been having. I don't play a whole lot of raise/fold but I'm perhaps not calling enough on flop + turn. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stats post: 100k hands and it turns out I suck.
[ QUOTE ]
You lost with quads 4 times? o.O Run better plzkkthx [/ QUOTE ] All these times the quads were on the board and I was outkicked. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stats post: 100k hands and it turns out I suck.
[ QUOTE ]
All these times the quads were on the board and I was outkicked. [/ QUOTE ] Damn. I was going to suggest you play more BBJ :-D |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stats post: 100k hands and it turns out I suck.
w$wsf is low because you don't do much raising in late position.
even your sb and bb pfr stats are low. your bb pfr, for instance, should be at least around 10%. don't be afraid to raise QJs against a CO open limper and SB. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stats post: 100k hands and it turns out I suck.
For sure your river agression is very low. I used to notice this a lot with some players who played too agressive on early streets with garbage and then by the time they got to the river they knew they couldn't beat anything so they'd check/call the river cause they didn't know what else to do. You also go to showdown quite a bit so I don't know if you're really folding that much either. Not a horrible thing but don't start calling with a lot of hands you're folding. Just mix it up more and call a bit more with your good/mediocre hands. You have to think what your raise is accomplishing, even at 1/2 but especially higher. Are you just getting them to fold bluffs and keep calling/raising with better hands or are you getting value out of your raise. There's not much you can do but try and rethink what you are doing on all postflop streets and why you are raising or calling against a particular opponent.
The biggest thing I look at is you have more than a 10% difference between your pfr and vpip. That's a lot when you defend your blind so little (Steal and defend closer to 40 each would be much better BTW). Are you overlimping a ton or even open limping? As a default, I wouldn't limp unless 2 or more players in front of you have. Otherwise, you should play raise/fold preflop outside of the big blind for the most part. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stats post: 100k hands and it turns out I suck.
[ QUOTE ]
The biggest thing I look at is you have more than a 10% difference between your pfr and vpip. That's a lot when you defend your blind so little (Steal and defend closer to 40 each would be much better BTW). Are you overlimping a ton or even open limping? As a default, I wouldn't limp unless 2 or more players in front of you have. Otherwise, you should play raise/fold preflop outside of the big blind for the most part. [/ QUOTE ] Thanks for the advice. I don't open limp but I will often limp things like small pairs with one limper in. |
|
|