PLEASE HELP, which is my best bet here?

[eb2phkingood]

ok if you HAD to choose between these two on the givin information which would you say is best for me?(approx past 2 months) Start with Full tilt; # of hands 56,100, winning sessions 47%, total won 1,082. nl25 max buy in 25 dollars. rakeback 27%. resizable tables so i can play twice as many hence why i have twice as many hands as Absolute.

Next, Absolute poker; #of hands 28,200, winning sessions 47.8%, total won 1,233. nl25 with 50 dollar buy in max (AP likes double stack buy ins) rakeback 30%

so anyways going on these factors which would you personally choose and why?. i win the same amount on both, yet i have played twice as many hands on FTP, but then again you buy in for 50 on AP so maybe that makes it even out. Any help much appreciated.

[BradleyT]

Why do you call it NL25 if you can buy in for $50?

[eb2phkingood]

because that is what poker tracker and poker ace label it under, apparently they use the blind structure of .25 as nl25

[sonneti]

Absolute, you get more cake back because you play twice as many hands.

[Josem]

i'd play on absolute 'cause i categorically refuse to play at FTP