169 Starting Hands Chart, by rank. I can't find that chart

[bigfonx]

Hello, I'm looking for this chart, I would like to have the chart that shows the 169 starting hole cards in texas hold'em, but I can't find it. Does someone know where I can find it?

PD: the one supplied by PokerRoom is not what I look for because PokerRoom order that 169 starting hands by Expected Value. Thanks for the help and kind regards.

[tarheeljks]

i think it is in one of the msnl/ssnl forum stickies.

[Gullanian]

I made one if it's what you are after:

[uDevil]

http://www.gocee.com/poker/HE_Value.htm

[drzen]

Is that HU against a random hand? Very pretty.

[6471849653]

94o seems to be much better a hand than I expected. I think I will start raising it from one off the button when I am the first one in or there's just one limper. The 54 (and 52s, not to mention the break even hands + position, hands like J2s, though it's unclear should they be played as high hands or as implied hands but I think their value is better heads up like that table indicates, though one could debate so with T6s also. Any ace should move all-in up to a 100 times stack maybe - see the Sklansky [& subacof or whatever, can't remember] tables for big all in raises) is still better to just limp after one limper as it has implied odds, but high hands like 94 do better heads up and should be raised. It's also pure Sklansky not only because of that but also as a hand that's almost worth to open-call or raise with is the ideal semi-bluff raising hand.

[malicor]

why is KK 66% on the one side and 68% on the other ?

[hennnerz]

[ QUOTE ]
why is AK 66% on the one side and 68% on the other ?

[/ QUOTE ]

FYP

[Perplexity]

suited and non-suited

LDO

[IzanPoker]

why is 72o not the worst %????