Charlie Rose talking to Dubya

[GoodCallYouWin]

Charlie Rose Special Edition: A conversation with President Bush

This was the first time I had seen Bush interviewed, as opposed to speaking at a podium. There weren't too many tough questions asked, but he did get into the question of sectarian vs Al Qaeda violance. I didn't detect any blatant lies but they may simply have slipped past my filter :



(bonus points : newest Ron Paul video)
Leading the Cause of Freedom in Iowa

[Nielsio]

hahahaha. I'm 2 minutes in and I'm already ROTFL. It's all a bunch of meaningless doublespeak, assertions, bluffing with air, head in the clouds, megalomania stuff.

[W brad]

[ QUOTE ]
I didn't detect any blatant lies but they may simply have slipped past my filter

[/ QUOTE ]

That is funny [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

This is what we get from our culture of personal destruction. We are told that Bush is a big liar just as we were told that Clinton is a big liar. So we go around believing it is true, they're liars!

Both sides seem to have lost all perspective and think the other side are all monsters.

Here's a clue: neither side are monsters (but what the heck, lets impeach 'em all anyway [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img])

[GoodCallYouWin]

But Bush IS a big lair... and a war criminal to boot. He's responsible for the death of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians.

[W brad]

[ QUOTE ]
But Bush IS a big lair... and a war criminal to boot. He's responsible for the death of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians.

[/ QUOTE ]

So you're saying Bush IS a monster.

And I suppose Clinton was a monster too.

Damn, I don't know how the culture of personal destruction marketing campaign somehow passed me over. I'll start watching the propaganda videos ASAP. Thanks for bringing this to my attention.

[GoodCallYouWin]

Clinton wasn't quite as bad; he reduced the size of government, which is a plus, but he bombed his share of countries too.

[Nielsio]

[ QUOTE ]
Clinton wasn't quite as bad; he reduced the size of government

[/ QUOTE ]

This is in all likeniness false.


[ QUOTE ]
but he bombed his share of countries too.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is correct; although presidents don't actually bomb, it's other people that do it for them. Those are the people I am mostly against.

[W brad]

[ QUOTE ]

This is correct; although presidents don't actually bomb, it's other people that do it for them. Those are the people I am mostly against.

[/ QUOTE ]

Are you saying we let the President off scot free while we throw the pilots into prison?

[GoodCallYouWin]

Well if I'm not mistaken, he reduced to military budget to 50% following the Cold War and when you consider the huge place the military industrial complex plays in the governments budget...

[Nielsio]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

This is correct; although presidents don't actually bomb, it's other people that do it for them. Those are the people I am mostly against.

[/ QUOTE ]

Are you saying we let the President off scot free while we throw the pilots into prison?

[/ QUOTE ]

What I am saying is that people are responsible for their actions.

And no, I don't believe that kidnapping and caging is moral.