Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > MTT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-20-2007, 10:32 PM
THAY3R THAY3R is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The Great White Hope
Posts: 9,755
Default KQ v Nath

Nath is very laggy, and I've noticed SammyJr play back at him a few times.

Thoughts?

Full Tilt Poker Game #1839398053: $35,000 Guarantee (13582397), Table 22 - 50/100 - No Limit Hold'em - 21:23:51 ET - 2007/02/20
Seat 1: KpKelly (1,245)
Seat 2: THAY3R (2,760)
Seat 3: pacho (1,080)
Seat 4: boon8 (2,400)
Seat 5: NDRudy46 (7,275)
Seat 6: twoblackaces (2,875)
Seat 7: The_Dean221 (2,250)
Seat 8: Tony Pisser (14,400)
Seat 9: SammyJr (4,580)
boon8 posts the small blind of 50
NDRudy46 posts the big blind of 100
The button is in seat #3
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to THAY3R [Qd Kh]
twoblackaces folds
The_Dean221 folds
Tony Pisser raises to 300
SammyJr raises to 1,050
KpKelly folds
THAY3R raises to 2,760, and is all in
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-20-2007, 10:34 PM
AragornX151 AragornX151 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 876
Default Re: KQ v Nath

Still seems a bit over-the-top to me; one of them could easily have a hand that dominates you. Not awful by any means, but I don't love it, and Sammy would have to have pure rags to muck here...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-20-2007, 10:36 PM
flyingmoose flyingmoose is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,253
Default Re: KQ v Nath

I don't like it. You have no fold equity, the overlay's small and you're still behind his range even if he's reraising lighter than normal.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-20-2007, 10:39 PM
Cornell Fiji Cornell Fiji is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,888
Default Re: KQ v Nath

This would be fine if you had 4500 chips. I don't like it with your short stack because you are too short to have fold equity against Sammy's reraising range
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-20-2007, 10:39 PM
mlagoo mlagoo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: confused
Posts: 12,644
Default Re: KQ v Nath

[ QUOTE ]
This would be fine if you had 4500 chips. I don't like it with your short stack because you are too short to have fold equity against Sammy's reraising range

[/ QUOTE ]

i agree with this
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-20-2007, 10:46 PM
AragornX151 AragornX151 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 876
Default Re: KQ v Nath

Yeah hence my point about Sammy needing total rags to muck.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-20-2007, 11:03 PM
NoahSD NoahSD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,925
Default Re: KQ v Nath

No, no, no, no, no.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-20-2007, 11:12 PM
bucktotal bucktotal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: the laboratory
Posts: 951
Default Re: KQ v Nath

[ QUOTE ]
No, no, nopwnd, no, no.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-20-2007, 11:23 PM
THAY3R THAY3R is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The Great White Hope
Posts: 9,755
Default Re: KQ v Nath

booooooo.

So is the consensus "Fine play, just not deep enough", or "Just fold donk."
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-20-2007, 11:34 PM
Bakes Bakes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,241
Default Re: KQ v Nath

i think its fine but i'd want bare minimum 3500, 4k+ pref.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.