#1
|
|||
|
|||
KQ v Nath
Nath is very laggy, and I've noticed SammyJr play back at him a few times.
Thoughts? Full Tilt Poker Game #1839398053: $35,000 Guarantee (13582397), Table 22 - 50/100 - No Limit Hold'em - 21:23:51 ET - 2007/02/20 Seat 1: KpKelly (1,245) Seat 2: THAY3R (2,760) Seat 3: pacho (1,080) Seat 4: boon8 (2,400) Seat 5: NDRudy46 (7,275) Seat 6: twoblackaces (2,875) Seat 7: The_Dean221 (2,250) Seat 8: Tony Pisser (14,400) Seat 9: SammyJr (4,580) boon8 posts the small blind of 50 NDRudy46 posts the big blind of 100 The button is in seat #3 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to THAY3R [Qd Kh] twoblackaces folds The_Dean221 folds Tony Pisser raises to 300 SammyJr raises to 1,050 KpKelly folds THAY3R raises to 2,760, and is all in |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KQ v Nath
Still seems a bit over-the-top to me; one of them could easily have a hand that dominates you. Not awful by any means, but I don't love it, and Sammy would have to have pure rags to muck here...
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KQ v Nath
I don't like it. You have no fold equity, the overlay's small and you're still behind his range even if he's reraising lighter than normal.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KQ v Nath
This would be fine if you had 4500 chips. I don't like it with your short stack because you are too short to have fold equity against Sammy's reraising range
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KQ v Nath
[ QUOTE ]
This would be fine if you had 4500 chips. I don't like it with your short stack because you are too short to have fold equity against Sammy's reraising range [/ QUOTE ] i agree with this |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KQ v Nath
Yeah hence my point about Sammy needing total rags to muck.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KQ v Nath
No, no, no, no, no.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KQ v Nath
[ QUOTE ]
No, no, nopwnd, no, no. [/ QUOTE ] |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KQ v Nath
booooooo.
So is the consensus "Fine play, just not deep enough", or "Just fold donk." |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KQ v Nath
i think its fine but i'd want bare minimum 3500, 4k+ pref.
|
|
|