LC: Collusion without consent?

[lurkling]

not converting for the purpose isnt the hand in question. its what happened. i emailed support. would you email support if villian didnt get there?


PokerStars Game #8296878990: Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00) - 2007/02/05 - 18:08:10 (ET)
Table 'Ceres III' 6-max Seat #3 is the button
Seat 1: Geert99 ($98 in chips)
Seat 2: Schollie ($542.75 in chips)
Seat 3: jerlin ($51.40 in chips)
Seat 4: xxx ($111.55 in chips)
Seat 5: NoCalmMeant ($75 in chips)
Seat 6: bigshowfan ($113.45 in chips)
xxx: posts small blind $0.50
NoCalmMeant: posts big blind $1
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to xxx [Kh Ks]
bigshowfan: calls $1
Geert99: folds
Schollie: raises $4 to $5
jerlin: folds
xxx: raises $13 to $18
NoCalmMeant: folds
bigshowfan: folds
Schollie: calls $13
*** FLOP *** [Td 2h Qs]
xxx: bets $25
Schollie: calls $25
*** TURN *** [Td 2h Qs] [8c]
xxx: bets $68.55 and is all-in
bigshowfan said, "folded q/10"
bigshowfan said, "folded q/10"
xxx said, "quiet"
Schollie: calls $68.55
*** RIVER *** [Td 2h Qs 8c] [Js]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
xxx: shows [Kh Ks] (a pair of Kings)
Schollie: shows [As Kc] (a straight, Ten to Ace)
Schollie collected $222.10 from pot

what would you say/do/want done?
do you consider this collusion?

i'm floored for obvious reasons.

[centgas]

not to ethical but i doubt they will do anything.

[dtemp]

Very unethical, if not cheating.

[AE6]

yeah, emailing support is reasonable here. funny call though

[4_2_it]

Pretty dumb colluders considering you can't see AIM chat anywhere. Also, I would think the QT guy would call and AK would fold, at least, that's how I would do it.

[lurkling]

you read it wrong.

[4_2_it]

[ QUOTE ]
you read it wrong.

[/ QUOTE ]

How so? The guys to be worried about are in teams and using AIM chat. They will never chat anything like this to each other in the site chat box. If they were a real team, then why would QT fold? These guys sound like the perfect idiots you want at your table. One folds the best hand while the other calls with a 7 outer.

[sdfsdf]

talking about a hand during a hand is against the TOS

[4_2_it]

[ QUOTE ]
talking about a hand during a hand is against the TOS

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed, but that doesn't make this collusion.

[lurkling]

QT folded preflop not on the flop, im saying villian now knows new infomation whether he asked for it or not, not that those two are specifically colluding. that one player is giving the other an unfair edge. by saying QT that limits my hand to only one combination of QQ or TT and villian is already half as likely to be up against KK and AA. AQ is likely to check turn for pot control along with JJ, making AK and AJ pushing on the come the main hands to be up against.

obviously im not happy he got there. but the inbox chat wasnt helping me in any way.