#1
|
|||
|
|||
standard or collusionish?
Names redacted for hopeful objectivity
Background: Player C had won the last 7 pots 5 of them raising preflop the other 2 in walks. Payout structure is pstars standard 50-30-20 PokerStars Game #xxx: Tournament #xxx, Hold'em No Limit - Level VIII (200/400) - Table 'xxx 1' 9-max Seat #3 is the button Seat 1: A (303 in chips) Seat 3: B (2952 in chips) Seat 6: C (9730 in chips) Seat 9: D (515 in chips) A: posts the ante 25 B: posts the ante 25 C: posts the ante 25 D: posts the ante 25 C: posts small blind 200 D: posts big blind 400 *** HOLE CARDS *** A: folds B: folds C: folds D said, "=)" D collected 500 from pot |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: standard or collusionish?
I have no idea what this means...are you saying it's possible collusion because the SB folded and then the BB smiled about it?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: standard or collusionish?
if there was any collusion involved the BB would have had more than 515 chips to begin the hand anyways.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: standard or collusionish?
LOL at this being collusion.
its a 6.50, its just a dumb move |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: standard or collusionish?
would you ever collude for lets say 5$? Thats the worth of the hole thing if they do stuff like that 100 times (not to mention that it might not work every time...)
Good that you handle it in an anonymous way, but people who cheat in a 6$ are either a) doing experimenting for higher levels b) escaped out of the sanatation |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: standard or collusionish?
...or if player C is so good that hes smart enough to actually fold here....omg [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: standard or collusionish?
[ QUOTE ]
...or if player C is so good that hes smart enough to actually fold here....omg [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] That was actually my assumption. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: standard or collusionish?
duh, the world hates you...
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: standard or collusionish?
C is one of the presumably braindamaged donkeys that are commonplace at low limits.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: standard or collusionish?
standard
PokerStars Game #7948154491: Tournament #40616165, $15+$1 Hold'em No Limit - Level VII (100/200) - 2007/01/15 - 08:36:44 (ET) Table '40616165 1' 9-max Seat #9 is the button Seat 1: flanntheman1 (3525 in chips) Seat 6: dr3dd (165 in chips) Seat 8: redtarlid (3370 in chips) Seat 9: Jonttt (6440 in chips) flanntheman1: posts the ante 25 dr3dd: posts the ante 25 redtarlid: posts the ante 25 Jonttt: posts the ante 25 flanntheman1: posts small blind 100 dr3dd: posts big blind 140 and is all-in *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to Jonttt [8c 3h] redtarlid: folds Jonttt: folds flanntheman1: folds dr3dd collected 300 from pot Jonttt said, "what" *** SUMMARY *** Total pot 300 | Rake 0 Seat 1: flanntheman1 (small blind) folded before Flop Seat 6: dr3dd (big blind) collected (300) Seat 8: redtarlid folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 9: Jonttt (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet) |
|
|