|
|
|
|
#2
10-14-2006, 10:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any update on the Jamie Gold prize-splitting case?
Heard it on the radio. He lost. He only gets to keep 6 million.
|
|
#3
10-14-2006, 11:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Any update on the Jamie Gold prize-splitting case?
[ QUOTE ]
Heard it on the radio. He lost. He only gets to keep 6 million. [/ QUOTE ] Source? Did they settle or did it go to trial/arbitration?
|
|
#4
10-14-2006, 10:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Any update on the Jamie Gold prize-splitting case?
A quick search didn't turn up anything of value, odd this hasn't been settled yet!
|
|
#5
10-14-2006, 01:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Any update on the Jamie Gold prize-splitting case?
[ QUOTE ]
A quick search didn't turn up anything of value, odd this hasn't been settled yet! [/ QUOTE ] It's not any odder than Gold trying to screw the guy in the first place. Lawsuits can go on for years.
|
|
#7
10-14-2006, 03:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: another question
[ QUOTE ]
Was Johnny Chan also promise a percentage? [/ QUOTE ] I dont remember where I read it, but, Johnny Chan said that he was NOT promised a percentage of any prizemoney.
|
|
#8
10-14-2006, 03:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: another question
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Was Johnny Chan also promise a percentage? [/ QUOTE ] I dont remember where I read it, but, Johnny Chan said that he was NOT promised a percentage of any prizemoney. [/ QUOTE ] The way that I remember it was a known player on this site responded to a thread like this by saying (somethin like this anyway) That the 2+2er was playing at the same table as Johnny Chan and he basically asked Chan if Gold paid him or not. IIRC Chan responded with something like "I didn't know he owed me anything" The 2+2er said Chan seemed mad that he was asked. The way I took it from reading that was Chan answered in a somewhat vague way. Leading everyone to believe Gold didn't owe Chan anything. But who knows Maybe Chan just didn't want to let on that he got screwed again! Someone posted a link a few months ago how Chan got swindled out of 100 - 150k. I don't remember who posted all that. I only remember it was someone who's higly regarded around here. Like when I read it I didn't doubt any of it.
|
|
#10
10-14-2006, 05:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Any update on the Jamie Gold prize-splitting case?
If you look at the District Court website, it has been removed to Federal Court:
" Case 06-A-526845-C Status CLOSED Plaintiff Leyser, Bruce C Attorney Chesnoff, David Z. Defendant Gold, Jamie M Attorney ## Unknown ## Judge Vega, Valorie J. Dept. 2 Total of 7 entries, presently displaying 1 through 7. Entries are displayed most recent first. Filed Date Description Performed 08/31/2006 NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF CIVIL ACTION TO FEDERAL COURT 08/31/2006 For All Parties Filed By State of Nevada 7 pages 08/25/2006 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE 08/25/2006 Outcome SERVICE DATE For Gold, Jamie M Filed By Leyser, Bruce C 1 page 08/22/2006 MINUTE ORDER RE: FOR 8/22/06 08/22/2006 For NP 08/21/2006 CASH BOND 221820 $1,000.00 For Leyser, Bruce C Filed By Leyser, Bruce C 1 page 08/21/2006 EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND OR PRELIMINARY For Leyser, Bruce C Filed By Leyser, Bruce C 18 pages 08/21/2006 PLTF'S TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER /01 09/01/2006 For All Parties 3 pages 08/21/2006 COMPLAINT FILED Fee $148.00 For Leyser, Bruce C 13 pages" Source: http://courtgate.coca.co.clark.nv.us...seActivity.asp I'm not sure where it went though, I don't see a way to search for it on the federal court's website.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
