Wild crazy loose table KK

[Bowlboy]

I'm sure that my play is obviously flawed on this scary board. However, the pot is huge and I have KK at a table full of maniacs. Is it ok to call down to river here, or should I have thrown this away on the flop or turn?
PokerStars 0.05/0.10 Hold'em (10 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)

Preflop: Hero is Button with K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img].
UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, <font color="#666666">4 folds</font>, CO calls, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, BB calls, <font color="#CC3333">UTG 3-bets</font>, UTG+1 calls, CO calls, <font color="#CC3333">Hero caps</font>, BB folds, UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, CO calls.

Flop: (18.40 SB) J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
UTG checks, UTG+1 checks, <font color="#CC3333">CO bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, <font color="#CC3333">UTG 3-bets</font>, UTG+1 calls, <font color="#CC3333">CO caps</font>, Hero calls, UTG calls, UTG+1 calls.

Turn: (16.20 BB) 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
UTG checks, UTG+1 checks, <font color="#CC3333">CO bets</font>, Hero calls, <font color="#CC3333">UTG raises</font>, UTG+1 calls, CO calls, Hero calls.

River: (24.20 BB) 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
UTG checks, UTG+1 checks, CO checks, Hero checks.

Final Pot: 24.20 BB

[MrWookie]

How maniacal are they? Stats? Example hands?

If they're people I'd call maniacs, your first three streets are fine, and I'd probably even bet the river.

[Veron]

Since this table is ''wild crazy loose'' as you say... I will never fold an overpair. And since this is 0.05/0.1 I think after the river checks you have a good enough hand to make a value bet. But stats/reads on the maniacs in particular are indeed very important.

[Bowlboy]

I started thinking that I should have value betted the river after the hand. My Kings up ended up holding up in the end, but i figured for sure somebody must have a jack with the heavy action went after the flop.

[Sushiglutton]

Bet the river to give UTG a chance to CR every street+limp/raise pf (a rare but beautiful play. Has anyone done this?).

Seriously I think u played fine. Don't fold an overpair against these fishes. Maybe you actually should bet the river. I don't think they're checking trips/or better.

[Smoke em']

If these people are truly maniacs then there's a pretty good chance that you're ahead on the flop, nothing on the later streets changes that. I would continue to be aggressive on the turn and river.

This play would depend on the exact reads you have on your opponents.

[stormy455]

[ QUOTE ]
How maniacal are they? Stats? Example hands?

If they're people I'd call maniacs, your first three streets are fine, and I'd probably even bet the river.

[/ QUOTE ]
I haven't read any farther than this post, but I think it sure seems to me that UTG and CO are maniacs based on this hand. UTG limps/3-bets preflop, checks/3-bets flop and check/raises turn. WTF? Was he trying to go for the quad check/raise on the river?? CO didn't seem to be concerned about UTG's crazy play until the river when he suddenly gave up. If he really had a hand wouldn't he be betting the river too? I agree that the first three streets are fine, but I don't understand why you would bet the river here? I know that one of my leaks is not value betting enough on the river, but is this really a good value bet?

Edit to add: Now that I've read the other posts it seems the consensus is to bet the river. I know I'm weak-tight on the river so please explain why a bet here makes sense?