#1
|
|||
|
|||
NL100: AK Passive / Pot Control Line
Exactly second hand at table - no stats yet.
Didn't want to play a big pot OOP here. Thoughts? Party Poker No Limit Holdem Ring game Blinds: $0.50/$1 6 players Converter Pre-flop: (6 players) Hero is SB with A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, 2 folds, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to $6</font>, 2 folds, UTG+1 calls. Flop: K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] ($14, 2 players) <font color="#cc0000">Hero bets $10</font>, UTG+1 calls. Turn: Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ($34, 2 players) Hero checks, <font color="#cc0000">UTG+1 bets $8</font>, Hero calls. River: 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] ($50, 2 players) Hero checks, UTG+1 checks. Results: Final pot: $50 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: AK Passive / Pot Control Line
Stacks?
(assuming 100bb Looks good. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: AK Passive / Pot Control Line
Crap. This converter doesn't automatically include stacks. 100bb is correct
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: AK Passive / Pot Control Line
this is fine. turn card sucks but he doesn't seem to have benefitted. i'd value bet the river in position with reads (and probably turn too) but OOP w/o reads minimizing damage is more important than maximizing value.
|
|
|