Zogby Poll: Over 70 Million American Adults Support New 9/11 Investiga

[illeagle]

http://news.yahoo.com/s/prweb/200605.../prweb388743_4

[ QUOTE ]
Utica, NY (PRWEB) May 22, 2006 -- Although the Bush administration continues to exploit September 11 to justify domestic spying, unprecedented spending and a permanent state of war, a new Zogby poll reveals that less than half of the American public trusts the official 9/11 story or believes the attacks were adequately investigated.


911Truth.org Urges 2006 Reform Candidates to Recognize a Powerful New Constituency.


The poll is the first scientific survey of Americans' belief in a 9/11 cover up or the need to investigate possible US government complicity, and was commissioned to inform deliberations at the June 2~4 "9/11: Revealing the Truth, Reclaiming Our Future" conference in Chicago. Poll results indicate 42% believe there has indeed been a cover up (with 10% unsure) and 45% think "Congress or an International Tribunal should re-investigate the attacks, including whether any US government officials consciously allowed or helped facilitate their success" (with 8% unsure). The poll of American residents was conducted from Friday, May 12 through Tuesday, May 16, 2004. Overall results have a margin of sampling error of +/- 2.9. All inquiries about questions, responses and demographics should be directed to Zogby International.


According to Janice Matthews, executive director of 911truth.org, "To those who have followed the mounting evidence for US government involvement in 9/11, these results are both heartening and frankly quite amazing, given the mainstream media's ongoing refusal to cover the most critical questions of that day. Our August 2004 Zogby poll of New Yorkers showed nearly half believe certain US officials 'consciously' allowed the attacks to happen and 66% want a fresh investigation, but these were people closest to the tragedy and most familiar with facts refuting the official account. This revelation that so many millions nationwide now also recognize a 9/11 cover up and the need for a new inquiry should be a wake up call for all 2006 political candidates hoping to turn this country around. We think it also indicates Americans are awakening to the larger pattern of deceit that led us into Constitutional twilight and endless war, and that our independent media may have finally come of age."


Poll co-author, W. David Kubiak concurs, saying: "Despite years of relentless media promotion, whitewash and 9/11 Commission propaganda, the official 9/11 story still can't even muster 50% popular support. Since this myth has been the administration's primary source of political and war-making power, this level of distrust has revolutionary implications for everyone working for peace, justice and civil liberties. If we ever hope to reclaim this country, end aggression and restore international respect, we all must finally scrutinize that day when things started to go so terribly wrong. The media and movement leaders ignore this call at their peril, because tens of millions are clearly telling us here they are ready for 9/11 truth."


SCOPE: The poll covered five related areas: 1)
Iraq - do Americans think the Bush administration exploited 9/11 to attack Iraq? (44% do, 44% don't); 2) Cover up - did the government and its 9/11 Commission conceal or refuse to investigate evidence that contradicts their official story? (only 48% said no); 3) the collapse of WTC 7, which was not even mentioned by the 9/11 Commission and has seldom been reported in the media---had respondents been aware of this collapse and, if so, did they think it should be investigated (only 52% had known about it, but over 70% of this group believe it should have been investigated); 4) new investigation of official complicity - do respondents think we need one? (only 48% said no); and 5) mass media - how do people rate its performance, including its coverage of alternative 9/11 theories, unanswered questions and inquiry issues? (43% rate it positively, 55% negatively).


(The poll sponsors see knowledge of the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 as a bellwether issue, because if people do not know this elementary fact, they have probably not been exposed to any independent 9/11 research at all. Because the number of respondents who support a new investigation of 9/11 (45%)) is roughly the same as the number who knew about the collapse of Building 7 (52%), it can reasonably be extrapolated that if the entire public were exposed to independent 9/11 research, about 90 percent would support a new investigation of the events of that fateful day.)


SPONSOR: 911truth.org is a coalition of researchers, journalists and victim family members working to expose and answer the hundreds of still unresolved questions concerning 9/11, especially the nearly 400 questions that the Family Steering Committee filed with the 9/11 Commission. Initially welcomed by the commissioners as their "road map," these queries cut to the heart of 9/11 crimes and accountability, specifically raising the central issues of motive, means and cui bono (who profited?). The Commission ultimately ignored 80% of these issues, however, opting only to explore system failures, miscommunications and incompetence. The victim families' most incisive questions remain unaddressed to this day.


For more information on the Chicago "9/11: Revealing the Truth, Reclaiming our Future" conference and other developments, see http://www.911truth.org and http://911revealingthetruth.org or contact our media coordinator, Michael Berger, at 314-308-4893.


* Numerical computations conservatively based on 2000 Census data citing 174 million Americans between the ages of 18 and 64.


Survey Methodology: Zogby America, 5/12/06 through 5/16/06


This is a telephone survey of adults nationwide conducted by Zogby International. The target sample is 1,200 interviews with approximately 81 questions asked. Samples are randomly drawn from telephone cd’s of national listed sample. Zogby International surveys employ sampling strategies in which selection probabilities are proportional to population size within area codes and exchanges. As many as six calls are made to reach a sampled phone number. Cooperation rates are calculated using one of AAPOR’s approved methodologies1 and are comparable to other professional public-opinion surveys conducted using similar sampling strategies.2 Weighting by region, party, age, race, religion, and gender is used to adjust for non-response. The margin of error is +/- 2.9 percentage points. Margins of error are higher in sub-groups.


Zogby International’s sampling and weighting procedures also have been validated through its political polling: more than 95% of the firm’s polls have come within 1% of actual election-day outcomes.

[/ QUOTE ]

[tomdemaine]

This is genius by the bush administration, make the question "did we blow up the twin towers?" rather than the real questions people should be asking about government incompetence pre and post 911.

[Copernicus]

[ QUOTE ]
This is genius by the bush administration, make the question "did we blow up the twin towers?" rather than the real questions people should be asking about government incompetence pre and post 911.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, true genius to intentionally undermine the last postitive trait that the public finds in the Administration..credibility.

That people can make such a$$es out of themselves, even anonymously, boggles the mind.

[MrMon]

More than 70 million Americans believe in creationism as well. Does that make it any more true?

[Cyrus]

[ QUOTE ]
The last postitive trait that the public finds in the Administration [is] credibility.



[/ QUOTE ]Credibility was actually the first thing that this administration lost.

Whatever credibility remains is only sustained by the gullibility of the public and the subservience of the media.

[..........]

[ QUOTE ]
More than 70 million Americans believe in creationism as well. Does that make it any more true?

[/ QUOTE ]

Point taken. But I think he’s just trying to show that more and more people are beginning to question the official story. I’m sure you’ll agree that there’s a significant difference between 70 million and 70 thousand.

Also, I don’t think creationism is the best analogy either. In fact I think it’s just the opposite. Most creationists seem to readily accept what they have been told their entire lives without much question or investigation. Hence creationism would seem not so much as a means of discovering the truth, but rather of not having to think about it too much.

And much like the administrations’ official story, creationism is steadily losing it’s foothold, while the 9/11 conspiracy theory is gaining momentum everyday.

[RedBean]

Anyone else notice this poll was done in May 2004, according to the article?

Anyone else remember in May 2004 when Zogby also predicted Kerry would win the election based on their poll results?

I take these polls with a grain of salt.

[Copernicus]

[ QUOTE ]
Anyone else notice this poll was done in May 2004, according to the article?

Anyone else remember in May 2004 when Zogby also predicted Kerry would win the election based on their poll results?

I take these polls with a grain of salt.

[/ QUOTE ]

2004 yet its described as a "new poll". Journalism at its best.

[RedBean]

[ QUOTE ]
2004 yet its described as a "new poll". Journalism at its best.

[/ QUOTE ]

To be fair, it isn't a piece of journalism....it's a PR release from 911truth.org.

Pretty much anyone can publish a PR release via PRWeb, it just happens that yahoo picked it up as a "story".

[MrMon]

You have to consider our source as well. He's a CIA agent provocateur. He's trying to keep us from knowing the "real" story by bring up false ones. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]