#1
|
|||
|
|||
T5s UTG+1, first level one allin, against maniac, easy call?
No reads. You guys call here? Since I won the hand I think it was a pretty good call by me. I think in situations like this you have to go with your gut. I had suited cards and got great pots odds with the best hand. This was the hand that helped catapult me to the FT.
PokerStars Game #5062026074: Tournament #25422459, $10+$1 Hold'em No Limit - Level I (10/20) - 2006/05/26 - 21:00:00 (ET) Table '25422459 2' 9-max Seat #5 is the button Seat 5: 1ee7 (1500 in chips) Seat 6: LittleStuey (1500 in chips) Seat 7: chezeman (1500 in chips) Seat 8: bob69 (1500 in chips) Seat 9: wpr101 (1500 in chips) LittleStuey: posts small blind 10 chezeman: posts big blind 20 *** HOLE CARDS *** chezeman said, "OMG" 1ee7 said, "ORLY?" chezeman said, "OMG" chezeman said, "I HAVE ACES" bob69: raises 1480 to 1500 and is all-in wpr101: calls 1500 and is all-in 1ee7: calls 1500 and is all-in LittleStuey: calls 1490 and is all-in chezeman: calls 1480 and is all-in *** FLOP *** [6d 6h 2c] chezeman said, "owned" LittleStuey said, "straight!" LittleStuey said, "JJJJJ" GreekHouse is connected *** TURN *** [6d 6h 2c] [3c] *** RIVER *** [6d 6h 2c 3c] [4h] *** SHOW DOWN *** LittleStuey: shows [8s Jc] (a pair of Sixes) chezeman: shows [Ac Qh] (a pair of Sixes - Ace kicker) bob69: shows [9d 8c] (a pair of Sixes - lower kicker) wpr101: shows [5h Th] (a straight, Deuce to Six) 1ee7: shows [Tc 7s] (a pair of Sixes) chezeman said, "YESSSSS" wpr101 collected 7500 from pot |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: T5s UTG+1, first level one allin, against maniac, easy call?
Even though your cards are suited, and it is likely that they have each other's outs, this is a debatable call, but I think its correct nonetheless. Nice hand.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: T5s UTG+1, first level one allin, against maniac, easy call?
All I'm saying is look at the results. I once remember reading a ZeeJustin blog entry about how he made a questionable call with KQs in a big MTT. The hand gave him chips to be able to win the tournament. I think this situation is very similar.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: T5s UTG+1, first level one allin, against maniac, easy call?
Am I missing something here? You were the first to call an UTG all-in with T5s.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: T5s UTG+1, first level one allin, against maniac, easy call?
Did chezeman realize that he didn't win?????????
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: T5s UTG+1, first level one allin, against maniac, easy call?
[ QUOTE ]
Am I missing something here? You were the first to call an UTG all-in with T5s. [/ QUOTE ] He was a total maniac and I had suited cards. I put him on any two... I figured my cards are suited and any two can win. This move is positive expected value in the long run, no question. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: T5s UTG+1, first level one allin, against maniac, easy call?
[ QUOTE ]
Did chezeman realize that he didn't win????????? [/ QUOTE ] Not until I won the hand and was moved to the final table. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: T5s UTG+1, first level one allin, against maniac, easy call?
Where did this hand occur/ did this hand occur?
I can't get over how great of a call you made, I like to think I would do the same, but perhaps I am just being results based. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: T5s UTG+1, first level one allin, against maniac, easy call?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Am I missing something here? You were the first to call an UTG all-in with T5s. [/ QUOTE ] He was a total maniac and I had suited cards. I put him on any two... I figured my cards are suited and any two can win. This move is positive expected value in the long run, no question. [/ QUOTE ] The stacks seem to indicate that this is the first hand. How do you have a read? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: T5s UTG+1, first level one allin, against maniac, easy call?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Did chezeman realize that he didn't win????????? [/ QUOTE ] Not until I won the hand and was moved to the final table. [/ QUOTE ]YSSCKY |
|
|