#1
|
|||
|
|||
NL200 - interesting river decisions
No real reads on villain. He doesn't seem all that great and is sitting short, so no reason to assume he's particularly good I'd imagine.
I probably should have folded PF. Given that I didn't, I think I should have bet the flop. I felt like a call on the river was too weak, but could I fold to the push given that I raised? Flame away b/c I'm pretty sure I deserve it. PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $2 BB (7 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums) MP1 ($121.05) MP2 ($112.60) CO ($94.60) Hero ($212.90) SB ($185) BB ($211.90) UTG ($241.90) Preflop: Hero is Button with 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, MP1 calls $2, MP2 calls $2, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, Hero calls $2, SB completes, BB checks. Flop: ($10) A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font> SB checks, BB checks, MP1 checks, MP2 checks, Hero checks. Turn: ($10) 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font> SB checks, BB checks, MP1 checks, MP2 checks, Hero checks. River: ($10) 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font> SB checks, BB checks, MP1 checks, <font color="#CC3333">MP2 bets $10</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $30</font>, SB folds, BB folds, MP1 folds, <font color="#CC3333">MP2 raises to $110.6</font>, Hero calls $80.60. Final Pot: $231.20 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL200 - very interesting river decision
Raising when it's been checked down to the river on anything less than the nuts is asking to be re-raised by the nuts. This is a rule I really try to stick to. It seems really weak to call here but your hand isn't that strong and what are you getting value out of, really? Is a 2 really calling that raise?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL200 - very interesting river decision
[ QUOTE ]
what are you getting value out of, really? Is a 2 really calling that raise? [/ QUOTE ] a 7 i think this hand is played fine, unless you have real reason to believe he'd slowplay the flush on the turn |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL200 - very interesting river decision
Do not bet the flop
I call the river but I don't feel great about doing so ... I've just seen crap enough here to justify it. You might also be splitting with 78 in which case a fold costs you $35. I feel like another 78 here is probably more likely than a flush. Re triumph36: a 7? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL200 - very interesting river decision
I won't correct it - I'll leave my stupidity to posterity but yes any 7 is also a possibility.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL200 - very interesting river decision
One thing I thought made this hand unique was that both my cards are used for the straight. I thought it was very possible 77 or 67 could have bet that river and would have also called a raise. I also thought I would have heard from a flush on the turn.
I'm just starting to work NL200 tables into my NL100 sets so I probably don't have a great feel for what will bet / call / raise in some situations. Edit: Forgot about A7. Probably any 7, though I feel those are the most likely. Edit 2: Seems every poster beat me to this post, but I'll leave it. |
|
|