Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-07-2006, 02:33 PM
Riku Riku is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Master of Law
Posts: 856
Default QJ, QT values

Im trying to take off my training wheels, but im having trouble in figuring out the values of QJs and QTs hands preflop.

Lets say im mp2 and one loose player limps in on mp1. There are people with 25 vpips behind me. Im not sure if i should raise to isolate and get heads up, or try to get some limpers behind me.

Am i correct if i state that QJs QTs hands play better multiway than they would heads up ? Thus if the guys behind me were pretty loose, i would just call to encourage multiway pot.

If i had KTs, K9s i would probaby raise to death, but didnīt exactly mind callers (at least with KTs).
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-07-2006, 02:43 PM
DrModern DrModern is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: O.K., so I\'m a fratboy
Posts: 2,463
Default Re: QJ, QT values

I rue hands like QT, s00ted or not, but I think that at a table with many people willing to cold-call raises, I don't have a problem with raising QTs or QJs from MP2. But at a tighter table, I am much more likely to limp. I'm mostly hoping to flop a flush or straight draw, thought top pair occasionally has some value as well (beware of possible kicker troubles in these situations, though).
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-07-2006, 03:10 PM
Genz Genz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: railtarding fanboy
Posts: 3,113
Default Re: QJ, QT values

I would mostly fold QTs in this position. And I would tend to limp with QJs. If you have cold-callers behind you, you will almost always be in a very nasty spot postflop. Both of these hands are so easily dominated. And when you have a two pair, there is always someone drawing at a straight. All this kind of stuff. They are difficult to play, often. So I wouldn't try to isolate unless the players behind me are very tight. A fold preflop often isn't a mistake with these hands.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-07-2006, 03:33 PM
DrModern DrModern is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: O.K., so I\'m a fratboy
Posts: 2,463
Default Re: QJ, QT values

[ QUOTE ]
I would mostly fold QTs in this position.

[/ QUOTE ]

Why's that?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-07-2006, 03:36 PM
henkeee henkeee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 140
Default Re: QJ, QT values

[ QUOTE ]
I think that at a table with many people willing to cold-call raises, I don't have a problem with raising QTs or QJs from MP2. But at a tighter table, I am much more likely to limp.

[/ QUOTE ]

I would tend to do the opposite. Raise and isolate the loose player at a tight table (where people actually fold) and call in a loose game and evalutate at the flop. At a tight table you can take the pot down unimproved, so a raise has more value.

Generally I fold QTs in this spot and QJs I play differently from time to time. I don't think I play QJs optimally, but it's a good stealing hand (you can represent and get away from an A/K and if you hit you are in fairly good condition).
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-07-2006, 03:40 PM
DrModern DrModern is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: O.K., so I\'m a fratboy
Posts: 2,463
Default Re: QJ, QT values

Why would you want to isolate with a hand that has little showdown value in its own right? See the thread about isolation raises. Your favorite kind of flop with QTs and QJs is one that gives you a flush or straight draw. When I advocated raising with these at tables with lots of cold callers, it's because you're looking to win a large pot with a flush or straight (though, as I said, sometimes TP is enough).
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-07-2006, 05:23 PM
henkeee henkeee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 140
Default Re: QJ, QT values

[ QUOTE ]
Why would you want to isolate with a hand that has little showdown value in its own right?

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, it all depends on the villain. If he's loose, not to aggressive and don't see "every" showdown then QJs doesn't look too bad. But it's not a hand I would try to isolate with here. My response was not so clear, but QJs is a good hand to open raise quite early though.

[ QUOTE ]
See the thread about isolation raises. Your favorite kind of flop with QTs and QJs is one that gives you a flush or straight draw. When I advocated raising with these at tables with lots of cold callers, it's because you're looking to win a large pot with a flush or straight (though, as I said, sometimes TP is enough).

[/ QUOTE ]

In my response I was mostly talking in general about what table conditions I prefer when to raise or call after a single loose player. I didn't say QJs is the best hand to try to isolate with. I don't expect it to be a large mulitway pot at the tables I play at if I raise in this spot. I rather raise it in position after several limpers.

If I raise and get one cold caller or a loose blind to call, then I'm not so happy. If I raise at a tight table and get's it HU with a bad player instead of letting BB see the flop for free, then I'm happier.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-07-2006, 07:04 PM
drzen drzen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Donkeytown
Posts: 2,704
Default Re: QJ, QT values

[ QUOTE ]
Why would you want to isolate with a hand that has little showdown value in its own right?

[/ QUOTE ]

It's the vogue here. We are just so much better than the fish that our cards magically become unbeatable if we isolate them. Really.

Ed Miller did not say take the training wheels off by becoming a LAG. *Sometimes* there is more value in pushing edges but sometimes those edges are illusory. Even our loose opponents do not have random cards.

Anyway, the extra value of suitedness/connectedness is pretty much lost if you are playing heads up. You've shut out all the players who would pay off your flush/straight. So all you have basically is QJ/QT. That's a bit like charging into a battle in just your underwear.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-07-2006, 07:11 PM
kerowo kerowo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,880
Default Re: QJ, QT values

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Why would you want to isolate with a hand that has little showdown value in its own right?

[/ QUOTE ]

It's the vogue here. We are just so much better than the fish that our cards magically become unbeatable if we isolate them. Really.

Ed Miller did not say take the training wheels off by becoming a LAG. *Sometimes* there is more value in pushing edges but sometimes those edges are illusory. Even our loose opponents do not have random cards.

Anyway, the extra value of suitedness/connectedness is pretty much lost if you are playing heads up. You've shut out all the players who would pay off your flush/straight. So all you have basically is QJ/QT. That's a bit like charging into a battle in just your underwear.

[/ QUOTE ]

Except in certain situations you are charging into battle against a paper target. 70%+ vpip players are playing a wide assortment of cards, the vast majority of which are dominated by any two face cards. If you can isolate them with such a hand you can extract value from them you wouldn't get from a tighter player. It requires reads on those in front of you and those left to act though, if you have loose calling stations behind you the isolation raise isn't such a great play. If it is vpip 12s behind you it becomes easier to do. Although most of those guy's probably know your fish too and will 3-bet you to isolate YOU.

Yes, sometimes fish have cards, but you don't make money betting that way.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.