|
View Poll Results: What percentage of guys could you beat in a fight? | |||
0-10 | 37 | 6.25% | |
10-20 | 51 | 8.61% | |
20-30 | 81 | 13.68% | |
30-40 | 58 | 9.80% | |
40-50 | 45 | 7.60% | |
50-60 | 49 | 8.28% | |
60-70 | 70 | 11.82% | |
70-80 | 74 | 12.50% | |
80-90 | 31 | 5.24% | |
90-100 | 35 | 5.91% | |
Dunno / Show results | 61 | 10.30% | |
Voters: 592. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
party vs stars difference
i dont know how to explain this
but im reaching the end of my rope in this matter is it possible to be up 200k on partypoker with sng,s (sample size 10.000) and being down 70k on stars also with sample size 10.000 with the note that my last 6000 sng's on stars the loss stabilized i lost 70k in the first 4000 and now with vip milestone bonuses and ffp i can keep it even but with horrendous swings of 100 buyins up and down right know my mind is playing tricks on me i have the feeling that my allins are sucked out more on stars than party suckouts happen and are part of the game ,i never ever complained about this on the table or anywhere else when they happen just started up a new game and went on but now my last 100buyin downswing its so dominant happening in my mind that its not even funny anymore i even got taunted from another regular who's got the same impression according to his remarks i know the level of play is different on stars and party so a litle difference can be explained but is the difference in skill realy that big? does anybody know a good program to load my hand histories in to calculate my sklansky bucks from all allin matchups to clearify this for me that im seeing ghosts and that indeed the skill difference is dominant or show that maybe my feeling is right that my sklansky bucks are behind the results because of some rare statistical occurance regards |
|
|