#1
|
|||
|
|||
were deep, we know it, i suck, ill show it
Villian $635 is unknown 23/17/4 hero covers and is about the same
Hero has 98ss in CO PF: limp, hero raises to 9, villian in SB raises to 25, folds, hero calls FLOP ($54): Q [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] T [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 7 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] Villian bets 45, Hero raises to 115, villian calls TURN ($284): 6 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] villian checks, hero bets 215, villian calls RIVER: ($704) T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] villian shoves, $280 to call Please dont mention pot odds either and try and figure out what villian has before telling me why I should call. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: were deep, we know it, i suck, ill show it
the only hand you lose to is AKs or AJs but you beat AA KK. and AT / TJs
True |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: were deep, we know it, i suck, ill show it
[ QUOTE ]
the only hand you lose to is AKs or AJs True [/ QUOTE ] The river paired the board, he loses to more than that |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: were deep, we know it, i suck, ill show it
He also loses to any set that filled up on the river. He's screwed but he's gotta call.
POT ODDS!! hahahhaha |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: were deep, we know it, i suck, ill show it
This spot kinda sucks.
I would bet more on the turn, probably overbet the pot. If the board pairs, or a flush hits, I don't want to have to make a decision like this. You also price in QQ+ and make your river decision much easier. If he is calling that $215 bet, why not go a bit more and really price him in. The last thing you want is to leave him with enough money to bluff you off the pot. The river is a call, I think (especially since he is an aggressive player), without a better read. Once the pot gets this large, I think the chances that he takes advantage of a scare card greatly increases. But I still think he has QQ a lot. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: were deep, we know it, i suck, ill show it
villain doesn't have a set.
True |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: were deep, we know it, i suck, ill show it
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] the only hand you lose to is AKs or AJs True [/ QUOTE ] The river paired the board, he loses to more than that [/ QUOTE ] TT is unlikely as is 77. QQ is definately in his range tho. So I wouldn't say a lot more, but a few hands. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: were deep, we know it, i suck, ill show it
[ QUOTE ]
This spot kinda sucks. I would bet more on the turn, probably overbet the pot. If the board pairs, or a flush hits, I don't want to have to make a decision like this. You also price in QQ+ and make your river decision much easier. If he is calling that $215 bet, why not go a bit more and really price him in. The last thing you want is to leave him with enough money to bluff you off the pot. The river is a call, I think (especially since he is an aggressive player), without a better read. Once the pot gets this large, I think the chances that he takes advantage of a scare card greatly increases. But I still think he has QQ a lot. [/ QUOTE ] Our hand is ridiculously disguised, Villain basically has the nuts on the turn with QQ, he would never c/c on this board. Don't be ridiculous. True |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: were deep, we know it, i suck, ill show it
Blah blah pot odds call.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: were deep, we know it, i suck, ill show it
Villains range is AA-TT and AKs with air mixed in once in a while. I guess 66,77 are possible but is he really 3-betting those OOP?
QQ C/R's that turn I think. I think you see AA/KK as often as QQ or the nut flush. My opinion is he has AK spade or TT. How can you fold though? Edit: also, pot the turn. He's not folding his range. |
|
|