#1
|
|||
|
|||
Stats Post. Is my success variance or a good start?
I have been playing on and off for a month, reading more than I play, and talking poker with a semi-professional co-worker for 4 months, and I wanted to see what some of you veterans thought of the numbers I am putting up. My friend believes I am doing well, and wanted to patch up any leaks that might be apparant, given I have only so many hands.
Total Hands: 1.528 VP%IP: 15.84 "" from SB: 24.57 Folded SB to Steal 87.5 "" BB to Steal: 99.9 Fold BB to Steal HU 100 Att. to steal blinds 18.4 Won $ when saw flop: 36.85 BB/100: 8.83 Went To Showdown: 33.96 Won $ at SD: 56.88 PFR: 7.53 limp/call Reraise PF: .26 FIRST ACTION ON FLOP AFTER PFR Raise: 15.6 Bet: 65.14 Call: 8.26 Check: 6.4 C/r: 0 Fold: 4.5 Aggression Factors Pre-flop: .7 Flop:3.2 Turn: 3.8 River: 2.5 Total: 1.7 Folded to River Bet: 36.11 (out of 36) <--- I feel my most apparant leak. Check Raises: .94% (Flop 25, Turn 25, River 50) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stats Post. Is my success variance or a good start?
One and a half hands isn't enough to know anything about your play.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stats Post. Is my success variance or a good start?
so far too tight...seek a hand chart
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stats Post. Is my success variance or a good start?
voya, please reread the FAQ stickied at the top and linked to above.
eg from it [ QUOTE ] Playing many hands is very important before you begin to analyze any of the following stats. Some stats begin to converge fairly quickly (VPIP may be somewhat representative after 1000 hands) while other stats take a very long time to be meaningful (50K - 100K minimum to begin to look at your winrate). Often your style has changed by the time a stat converges to a meaningful number. If you feel as though you must post a stat post, it is strongly recommended that you have at least a 10K hand sample size. Until you reach 10K hands, your stats will often vary too much to put much weight on them. Use the following guide to track your progress and stat fluctuations relative to the typical ranges of these stats. The following ranges are provided for 10 player ring games at the micro level, but will remain fairly consistent as you move up. [/ QUOTE ] I expect that this thread will be shortly lockable (guys, at least give this thread a little time to live before the inevitable) but ill ignore the fact that your sample size is super small (I assume u mean 1.5k hands) and make the following comment 1. you are running ridiculously hot. it will end 2. your VPIP is lowish but thats okay I suppose 3. you dont steal enough...doing so gets your PFR up to 10+ summary: Youve made a good start. You are a bit weak tight and running hot. over the long term, at best, you probably will be a small winner but wont be crushing the games. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stats Post. Is my success variance or a good start?
[ QUOTE ]
so far too tight...seek a hand chart [/ QUOTE ] BUZZ, u r funny [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stats Post. Is my success variance or a good start?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] so far too tight...seek a hand chart [/ QUOTE ] BUZZ, u r funny [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Fix pic plz |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stats Post. Is my success variance or a good start?
Does 1.528 hands mean 1,528 hands?
Post this stuff again when you hit at least 10,000 hands. Too early to tell. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stats Post. Is my success variance or a good start?
[ QUOTE ]
One and a half hands isn't enough to know anything about your play. [/ QUOTE ] No, but that extra twenty-eight thousandths oughtta tell us a little something, dont'cha think? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stats Post. Is my success variance or a good start?
It's a habit from spanish class. I'm surprised I didn't enter my decibles as 12,34%
Oh, Europe. |
|
|