#1
|
|||
|
|||
Semi-Bluff with no FE?
Client in the hand is your standard 52/8 beast. Client was fond of min raising c-bets, and donk min betting into pre-flop raisers.
Hero: 24/17 and had not tangled with client as of yet. Hero has less than a PSB left on the turn. Who likes betting and who likes taking a free one in posish? Given read on client, does anyone like just calling the flop min raise? Comments on all streets appreciated. Full Tilt Poker, $0.50/$1 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter Hero (CO): $102.65 BTN: $101 SB: $92.40 BB: $125.90 UTG: $84.85 MP: $107.60 Pre-Flop: Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (CO) 2 folds, <font color="red">Hero raises to $3.50</font>, 2 folds, BB calls $2.50 Flop: ($7.50) 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 6 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players) BB checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $6</font>, <font color="red">BB raises to $12</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises to $36</font>, BB calls $24 Turn: ($79.50) 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players) BB checks, Hero???? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Semi-Bluff with no FE?
shove or call flop, 3b is pointless. (if someone mentions balancing they're going on ignore [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img])
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Semi-Bluff with no FE?
Yeah, I kinda like a shove here, even it being way bigger than pot - you'll get looked up by random crap like T9 more than you think. As played, I check it back. What makes you think he's going to fold whatever made hand he has now?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Semi-Bluff with no FE?
3bet size is bad, I make it atleast 44, do not like shove. As played, I'm taking a free card.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Semi-Bluff with no FE?
[ QUOTE ]
3bet size is bad, I make it atleast 44, do not like shove. As played, I'm taking a free card. [/ QUOTE ] why is 44 > shove? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Semi-Bluff with no FE?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 3bet size is bad, I make it atleast 44, do not like shove. As played, I'm taking a free card. [/ QUOTE ] why is 44 > shove? [/ QUOTE ] I don't think the burden of proof is on me. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Semi-Bluff with no FE?
[ QUOTE ]
Yeah, I kinda like a shove here, even it being way bigger than pot - you'll get looked up by random crap like T9 more than you think. [/ QUOTE ] Don't we want random crap like T9 to fold here? The old letting villain make a mistake instead of getting it in when marginally in front. Let's do the math, wheeee: Board: 9s 6d 3s Dead: equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 48.123% 48.12% 00.00% 5717 0.00 { T9s, T9o } Hand 1: 51.877% 51.88% 00.00% 6163 0.00 { AsQs } Pot is $25.50 after villain's minraise, we have $93.15 in our stack: EV of shoving and getting called, by T9: (.52*($25.50 (pot) + $87.15[villain's call])) + (.48*(-$93.15)) = $58.58 -$44.71 = $13.87 EV of shoving and villain folding: $25.50 (pot) I don't see a shove here because I think a normal raise (44 sounds about right) has more FE. If you feel you have no FE vs this specific villain then a call is best. On turn I check behind. Most 50/8s don't like folding turn after calling a 3-bet on the flop in my experience. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Semi-Bluff with no FE?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Yeah, I kinda like a shove here, even it being way bigger than pot - you'll get looked up by random crap like T9 more than you think. [/ QUOTE ] Don't we want random crap like T9 to fold here? The old letting villain make a mistake instead of getting it in when marginally in front. Let's do the math, wheeee: Board: 9s 6d 3s Dead: equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 48.123% 48.12% 00.00% 5717 0.00 { T9s, T9o } Hand 1: 51.877% 51.88% 00.00% 6163 0.00 { AsQs } Pot is $25.50 after villain's minraise, we have $93.15 in our stack: EV of shoving and getting called, by T9: (.52*($25.50 (pot) + $87.15[villain's call])) + (.48*(-$93.15)) = $58.58 -$44.71 = $13.87 EV of shoving and villain folding: $25.50 (pot) I don't see a shove here because I think a normal raise (44 sounds about right) has more FE. If you feel you have no FE vs this specific villain then a call is best. On turn I check behind. Most 50/8s don't like folding turn after calling a 3-bet on the flop in my experience. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, we do. I guess I was just trying to make the point that he doesn't only call with sets. I think there's a decent amount of FE and more than 25% actual equity if called. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Semi-Bluff with no FE?
I shove flop and think the burden of proof is on the people saying 3bet to 44 :P
I want the money in with good equity, flushcard often scares donks off even if they should be committed and I think vs donkish players the shove does not have less FE than betting 44. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Semi-Bluff with no FE?
I agree, flop raise size sucked.
|
|
|