#1
|
|||
|
|||
$16 bubble hand - Weird call?
Can someone run this through an ICM? Paulus33 is a winning player and I've played with him quite a few times, so he knows I know what Im doing. Even if he knows im pushing ATC, what does his he have to have to make this call and be +ev? I think KQ is way too weak, and is pretty -ev for both of us.
I think I call with 88+, AJ+. PokerStars Game #10188369883: Tournament #51634463, $15+$1 Hold'em No Limit - Level IX (300/600) - 2007/05/30 - 18:39:28 (ET) Table '51634463 1' 9-max Seat #1 is the button Seat 1: matkinson (1355 in chips) Seat 4: double a tom (6245 in chips) Seat 5: paulus33 (3800 in chips) Seat 8: SongheJe (2100 in chips) matkinson: posts the ante 50 double a tom: posts the ante 50 paulus33: posts the ante 50 SongheJe: posts the ante 50 double a tom: posts small blind 300 paulus33: posts big blind 600 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to double a tom [3c 4s] paulus33 said, "very true" SongheJe: folds matkinson: folds double a tom: raises 5595 to 6195 and is all-in paulus33: calls 3150 and is all-in *** FLOP *** [2d 4h 5d] *** TURN *** [2d 4h 5d] [2s] matkinson said, "590 hands isn't enough to account for variance though" paulus33 said, "gg" *** RIVER *** [2d 4h 5d 2s] [Ks] *** SHOW DOWN *** double a tom: shows [3c 4s] (two pair, Fours and Deuces) paulus33: shows [Kc Qs] (two pair, Kings and Deuces) paulus33 collected 7700 from pot *** SUMMARY *** Total pot 7700 | Rake 0 Board [2d 4h 5d 2s Ks] Seat 1: matkinson (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 4: double a tom (small blind) showed [3c 4s] and lost with two pair, Fours and Deuces Seat 5: paulus33 (big blind) showed [Kc Qs] and won (7700) with two pair, Kings and Deuces Seat 8: SongheJe folded before Flop (didn't bet) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $16 bubble hand - Weird call?
Even on ATC, which you should be on, that is a terrible call.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $16 bubble hand - Weird call?
Maybe TT+ he can call with? I'll run the numbers to see just how bad that call is assuming you're on ATC.
Edit: after running the numbers, his call is -2.3% and should be calling 88+. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $16 bubble hand - Weird call?
[ QUOTE ]
Maybe TT+ he can call with? I'll run the numbers to see just how bad that call is assuming you're on ATC. Edit: after running the numbers, his call is -2.3% and should be calling 88+. [/ QUOTE ] ty |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $16 bubble hand - Weird call?
its just sick when donks suck out like a dyson in that way. im beat but ill call anyway , wheres the logic ? ill ask again WHERE is the logic *waves hands at "god" in frustrating manner*
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $16 bubble hand - Weird call?
[ QUOTE ]
its just sick when donks suck out like a dyson in that way. im beat but ill call anyway , wheres the logic ? ill ask again WHERE is the logic *waves hands at "god" in frustrating manner* [/ QUOTE ] Some people don't think like this, and some think KQ is the nuts. |
|
|