Tourneys OVER-Saturated

[AlanDyer]

I believe SNG's have a high probability of becoming unprofitable.

For example, the multi tabling feats even intermediate level players are capable of [not to mention the 25 table extravaganza talked about].

If every good player plays 6-18 tournaments, that means they're being represented by 6-18 times. How many fish can there possibly be?

It won't be too long before 5-8 of the seats of EVERY sng are full of us. Time to learn a new game!

[sippin_criss]

Uh, have you seen some of the crap that goes on by donkeys in sng's? I played a session of 40 27's last night and didn't see that many guys I recognized at all.

[mondonman]

I don´t see that anytime soon.
Each time I start s set I am expecting to see way more familiar good players than there really are at the end.

[dave1mo]

[ QUOTE ]
Uh, have you seen some of the crap that goes on by donkeys in sng's? I played a session of 40 27's last night and didn't see that many guys I recognized at all.

[/ QUOTE ]

That's because I moved back down. Otherwise you wouldn't have made a dollar of profit.

[zjd]

just because you recognize some players doesnt mean they are good!

[dave1mo]

On a serious note...you'd be amazed at how many MTers there are out there that just aren't very good. I see them all the time at the 16s and 27s.

[bluefeet]

Same post, different day.