#1
|
|||
|
|||
Collusion ruling
If I'm short stacked in a tournament, go all-in, get multiple callers, then one of the callers mentions to another caller that they should all just check to knock me out. Would I be able to get a rulling that would nullify their hands in any way?
TIA |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Collusion ruling
They would probably get a penalty after the hand, but I don't know that a floor would kill their hand.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Collusion ruling
No way are they going to kill anybody's hand. You might get a TD to issue a penalty to Mr Loudmouth. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Collusion ruling
[ QUOTE ]
If I'm short stacked in a tournament, go all-in, get multiple callers, then one of the callers mentions to another caller that they should all just check to knock me out. Would I be able to get a rulling that would nullify their hands in any way? TIA [/ QUOTE ] I've had this happen several times, and it really pissed me off. I did not bitch to the deal or the TD, but I told the guy to keep his mouth shut during the hand next time - and that it is considered collusion or cheating when you do it. It's different when everyone kinda just knows to do it. I could care less then. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Collusion ruling
No, you can't kill a hand for this. What normally happens for each successive infraction is: warning, time penalty, disqualification.
There may be some casinos that assess disqualification before the hand is over which would mean a killed hand. Never seen that happen though. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Collusion ruling
Maybe a penalty after...not gonna kill their hands.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Collusion ruling
[ QUOTE ]
If I'm short stacked in a tournament, go all-in, get multiple callers, then one of the callers mentions to another caller that they should all just check to knock me out. Would I be able to get a rulling that would nullify their hands in any way? TIA [/ QUOTE ] so you like to fight angles with angles? nice. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Collusion ruling
I don't consider enforcing the rules to be an angle.
If the tourney has a rule about explicit "check it down" collusion, then I think suggesting it should not only get the cheater's hand killed, but get him removed from the tournament with no refund. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Collusion ruling
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If I'm short stacked in a tournament, go all-in, get multiple callers, then one of the callers mentions to another caller that they should all just check to knock me out. Would I be able to get a rulling that would nullify their hands in any way? TIA [/ QUOTE ] so you like to fight angles with angles? nice. [/ QUOTE ] DO you EVER have a decent (notice I didn't say nice) answer for somone new? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Collusion ruling
[ QUOTE ]
I don't consider enforcing the rules to be an angle. [/ QUOTE ] That is typically what most angles consist of. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|