#1
|
|||
|
|||
King high river decision (NL$1000)
Villain is 29/14/1.7 (50) so fairly meaningless stats.
I'm so short because I buy in for $400 and play till its gone. It's part of a planning and managed short-stack system I'm using to try and build a bankroll at a quicker rate than grinding. Full Tilt Poker - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $5/$10 Blinds - 6 Players - (LegoPoker HH Converter) SB: $1,074.80 BB: $615.00 UTG: $359.75 MP: $1,182.00 CO: $1,828.60 Hero (BTN): $211.00 Preflop: Hero is dealt J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (6 Players) 3 folds, <font color="red">Hero raises to $35.00</font>, SB folds, BB calls $25.00 Flop: ($75) Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (2 Players) BB checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $65.00</font>, BB calls $65.00 Turn: ($205) 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players) BB checks, Hero checks River: ($205) A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players) <font color="red">BB bets $205.00</font> Hero? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: King high river decision (NL$1000)
You wanna call with king high?
Other than that I dont think a shortstack system is good for building bankroll, you will have a ton of variance with all the preflop allins you can't avoid. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: King high river decision (NL$1000)
[ QUOTE ]
I'm so short because I buy in for $400 and play till its gone. [/ QUOTE ] This is not a good strategy [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] Fold the hand obv. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: King high river decision (NL$1000)
i like it
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: King high river decision (NL$1000)
[ QUOTE ]
Fold the hand obv. [/ QUOTE ] what do you put him on? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: King high river decision (NL$1000)
[ QUOTE ]
what do you put him on? [/ QUOTE ] Agree, those suggesting fold what is his range in your opinion? Point taken re: short stacked play, Ed Holis has had zero success afterall [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: King high river decision (NL$1000)
Update
I called and lost to Ad,xd which was the hand I figured to be most likely. That was a specific read/fear but my estimations of his range were far wider which is why I called. As PFR'er that ace has a reasonable probability of having hit me. If he was calling with a piece of the board or PP on the flop then he is turning a hand with some SD value into a pure bluff. I find it doubtful he ever bets one pair here like this and I don't think he calls the flop with a naked ace. He may have played 99 in this manner but I think he plays missed flushes and a number of other non-paired hands in this manner. I think he makes this bluff around 1/3rd of the time given the way the hand has been played and 2/3rds the time I expect to see 99, A4, A2, Adxd. Agree/disagree? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: King high river decision (NL$1000)
[ QUOTE ]
i like it [/ QUOTE ] hero has put in 50% of his stack. do you expect weakish regs to be bluffing shortstacks? i think the call is terrrrrible and im like the king of spewy river high card calls. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: King high river decision (NL$1000)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Fold the hand obv. [/ QUOTE ] what do you put him on? [/ QUOTE ] Itīs not like the ace is the greatest of bluffcards for villain and therefore I think he is valuebetting here almost always. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: King high river decision (NL$1000)
even tho I think hes repping a pretty thin range, i think it's the range that beats K high
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|