#1
|
|||
|
|||
A Subject that hasnt been discussed.
although im guessing that this topic wont get many good replies because people dont want to give stuff away, ill give it a try anyways.
maybe its silly and unimportant, but im curious. why and when, do u lead into a pre flop RE-raiser? is it only when deeper and u want to lead/3bet? or bet fold certain hands? i have seen the play quite a bit at the higher levels, so there must be something to it. I thought of this after sweating a bld v H@ll match where this hand happened: H@££INGGOL: raises $150 to $200 NotThiSTiMe: raises $525 to $725 H@££INGGOL: calls $525 *** FLOP *** [2s 9h 4h] H@££INGGOL: bets $1150 NotThiSTiMe: raises $4173 to $5323 and is all-in H@££INGGOL: calls $4173 *** TURN *** [2s 9h 4h] [5d] *** RIVER *** [2s 9h 4h 5d] [Jh] *** SHOW DOWN *** H@££INGGOL: shows [6c 9c] (a pair of Nines) NotThiSTiMe: shows [Ts Jc] (a pair of Jacks) anybody have any ideas? if u dont want to post, maybe pm me? thanks. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Subject that hasnt been discussed.
was this headsup?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Subject that hasnt been discussed.
[ QUOTE ]
was this headsup? [/ QUOTE ] yes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Subject that hasnt been discussed.
this was, yes, but im interested in any numbers of players from 2-6.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Subject that hasnt been discussed.
There could be several reasons. One of the top of my head is If the re-raiser doesnt always c-bet and they are in position then you need to make this donk bet with a decent range of hands.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Subject that hasnt been discussed.
i dont think you should be leading into a preflop reraiser with ~normal sized stacks if you don't think your hand is best. so it would usually be to induce a raise, probably because the line is so strange and not taken often.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Subject that hasnt been discussed.
i think it's a move kinda like open pushing in weird spots. if you have a good idea of how the other guy will treat it you can get some great results, but it usually shouldn't be used because there is almost always a better line. against the right opponent, though, it can be very powerful either as a bluff or to induce a bluff, obviously. i agree with you, though, that it's a weird line. it's a line that's very hard to play against, though.
edit: can you also un* me? wtf? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Subject that hasnt been discussed.
I would do it if I think there is a good chance my opponent has reraised over cards like AK, AQ.. and low cards hit. Then there is a good chance your opponent will make a lay down.
But with this hand I think Hall just hates to let hands go. And he would rather play the flop aggressively then check it. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Subject that hasnt been discussed.
top corner, we're glad you would do that so he lays down the worst hand. expert play.
cliff notes: you have no idea what you are talking about |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Subject that hasnt been discussed.
im me next time yer online n not playin...
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|