#1
|
|||
|
|||
Packers sign Woodson
Great. The Packers' best players on each side of the ball are either too old or too hurt.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Packers sign Woodson
5 wins baby!!
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Packers sign Woodson
This might be the NFL's worst non-Redskins signing in a decade. $50+ million?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Packers sign Woodson
It's basically a 3 year, $18 million deal from what I have read.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Packers sign Woodson
[ QUOTE ]
It's basically a 3 year, $18 million deal from what I have read. [/ QUOTE ] That's correct. The full term of any NFL deal is meaningless. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Packers sign Woodson
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] It's basically a 3 year, $18 million deal from what I have read. [/ QUOTE ] That's correct. The full term of any NFL deal is meaningless. [/ QUOTE ] I've even heard they didn't give him a traditional signing bonus but frontloaded the contract with roster bonuses. He'll make 10+ million the first year but they won't take any hit if they cut him after that and the base salaries will be reasonable for the next few years. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Packers sign Woodson
The packers are pretty far under the cap if I remember and there aren't even many people left to sign, so if the deal doesn't have long-term cap implications they might as well go ahead and waste the money.
Maybe Favre can go out 6-10 instead of 5-11. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Packers sign Woodson
Is he going to be playing their squat corner? I really can't see him doing anything than sitting in zone coverages. But I am not very familiar with the Pack's defense. But, if Woodson is healthy enough, him and Al Harris will be major impacts on that defense.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Packers sign Woodson
The packers will have a winning season.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Packers sign Woodson
[ QUOTE ]
It's basically a 3 year, $18 million deal from what I have read. [/ QUOTE ] This is still about $16 to $17 million too much. |
|
|