#1
|
|||
|
|||
[50NL] JJ, overpair on low-paired flop
No stats on villain.
Poker Stars, $0.25/$0.50 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 4 Players LeggoPoker Hand History Converter BTN: $34.75 SB: $44.50 BB: $26.80 Hero (UTG): $50 Pre-Flop: J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (UTG) <font color="red">Hero raises to $2</font>, BTN folds, SB calls $1.75, BB folds Flop: ($4.50) 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players) <font color="red">SB bets $3.50</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises to $10</font>, <font color="red">SB raises to $16.50</font>, <font color="red">Hero...</font> |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [50NL] JJ, overpair on low-paired flop
I don't think a flush draw plays it this way, the small reraise doesn't maximise fold equity. I doubt 55-88 plays it this way, so the question is, are we up against a loose enough villain who could have TT or 9x here enough to make up for the times he has 4x or 99 (or a less likely QQ+).
Without reads this is a fold for me, but then I did say that a flush draw wouldn't play it this way because it doesn't get fold equity, and now i'm suggesting folding, so that is a tad backwards. Hate having to fold an over pair to the minreraise, but what are we going to do on the turn, call another small bet? And again on the river? |
|
|