|
|
#1
10-09-2007, 05:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
FTP 25NL - bottom set, board gets wetter than a climaxing female
Villain is 36/4/0.5 over 126, no real reads, he's loose/passive though.
Full Tilt Poker, $0.10/$0.25 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players LegoPoker Hand History Converter UTG: $39.15 MP: $24.85 CO: $37.45 Hero (BTN): $33.05 SB: $26.35 BB: $26.75 Pre-Flop: 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (BTN) UTG calls $0.25, MP folds, <font color="red">CO raises to $0.50</font>, Hero calls $0.50, 2 folds, UTG calls $0.25 <font color="blue"> Standard call preflop, we're looking to flop a set. </font> Flop: ($1.85) K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (3 Players) UTG checks, CO checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $0.95</font>, UTG folds, CO calls $0.95 <font color="blue"> Underbet the flop here, kind of by accident. Maybe a little FPS in there too, looking for a raise from AK or KQ. Probably has a naked king. </font> Turn: ($3.75) J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players) CO checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $2.20</font>, CO calls $2.20 <font color="blue">Must bet here, if he was on a draw, and not AK , we'll know now. </font> River: ($8.15) Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players) CO checks, Hero checks <font color="blue"> [censored], never know how to play this, value bet, block bet, open fold, or check. I hate getting re-popped here, it's a perfect bluff opp for villain. I check. </font> Thoughts? 
|
|
#3
10-09-2007, 05:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FTP 25NL - bottom set, board gets wetter than a climaxing female
1/2 pot on the river...he's passive so if he pushes you can fold pretty safely. He'll call with a lot of worse hands so checking loses too much value.
You have no future as an author.
|
|
#4
10-09-2007, 05:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FTP 25NL - bottom set, board gets wetter than a climaxing female
*grunch*
I think I'm value betting the river here. From this kind of player I don't think you need to worry about getting check-raised on the river.
|
|
#5
10-09-2007, 05:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FTP 25NL - bottom set, board gets wetter than a climaxing female
Why 3bet pf? Why?
|
|
#6
10-09-2007, 05:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FTP 25NL - bottom set, board gets wetter than a climaxing female
[ QUOTE ]
Why 3bet pf? Why? [/ QUOTE ] you're facing a minraise, put some real money in there, take control of the pot. [censored] set mining.
|
|
#7
10-09-2007, 05:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FTP 25NL - bottom set, board gets wetter than a climaxing female
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Why 3bet pf? Why? [/ QUOTE ] you're facing a minraise, put some real money in there, take control of the pot. [censored] set mining. [/ QUOTE ] I can coincide with that. But I think it's spewy if he makes a standard raise.
|
|
#9
10-09-2007, 06:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FTP 25NL - bottom set, board gets wetter than a climaxing female
[ QUOTE ]
no, it's not, but especially here calling is dumb. the only time you would call pf is if villain minraises big pps. [/ QUOTE ] If you're 3betting OOP preflop, I'm curious as to how many Axx or Kxx flops you win with a c-bet...
|
|
#10
10-09-2007, 06:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FTP 25NL - bottom set, board gets wetter than a climaxing female
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] no, it's not, but especially here calling is dumb. the only time you would call pf is if villain minraises big pps. [/ QUOTE ] If you're 3betting OOP preflop, I'm curious as to how many Axx or Kxx flops you win with a c-bet... [/ QUOTE ] you have the button . . .
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
