#1
|
|||
|
|||
NL100 - QQ multiway deep against Unknown and TAG
UTG is a decent TAG running at 20.5/17/2.7 over 900 hands. I have 3 bet him from the blinds a few times and decide to call with QQ OOP and deep stacked.
BB is an unknown and I have no idea wtf his min raise means so i just call. Please evaluate each street, as I felt a little lost throughout this hand. Appreciated. Full Tilt Poker, $0.50/$1 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 4 Players LegoPoker Hand History Converter BB: $76.90 UTG: $245.45 BTN: $98.50 Hero (SB): $345.70 Pre-Flop: Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (SB) <font color="red">UTG raises to $3.50</font>, BTN folds, Hero calls $3, <font color="red">BB raises to $6</font>, UTG calls $2.50, Hero calls $2.50 Flop: ($18) J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (3 Players) Hero checks, <font color="red">BB bets $8</font>, UTG calls $8, Hero calls $8 Turn: ($42) 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (3 Players) <font color="red">Hero bets $22</font>, BB folds, UTG calls $22 River: ($86) 2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 Players) Hero checks, <font color="red">UTG bets $68</font>, Hero calls $68 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 - QQ multiway deep against Unknown and TAG
"I have 3 bet him from the blinds a few times"
3-betting loose, and than flatcalling QQ makes really no sense. You 3-bet loose to get more action when u got a Big hand. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 - QQ multiway deep against Unknown and TAG
[ QUOTE ]
"I have 3 bet him from the blinds a few times" 3-betting loose, and than flatcalling QQ makes really no sense. You 3-bet loose to get more action when u got a Big hand. [/ QUOTE ] Not only are do we three bet light to generate action, we also do it because these hands are (a) easier to play post flop and (b) we aren't dissapointed if we don't get to see a flop. With stack sizes taken into consideration I felt flatcalling was best as I didn't want to get pushed off the best hand on the flop. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 - QQ multiway deep against Unknown and TAG
"Not only are do we three bet light to generate action, we also do it because these hands are
(a) easier to play post flop and (b) we aren't dissapointed if we don't get to see a flop." yeah AND c) TO PROTECT OUR HAND! Your turnbet is way too small... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 - QQ multiway deep against Unknown and TAG
[ QUOTE ]
Your turnbet is way too small... [/ QUOTE ] I'd bet about $35 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 - QQ multiway deep against Unknown and TAG
"c) TO PROTECT OUR HAND!" - Not if we are unsure it is good.
Agreed the turn bet is too small though. Maybe 3/4 pot instead?? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 - QQ multiway deep against Unknown and TAG
[ QUOTE ]
"c) TO PROTECT OUR HAND!" - Not if we are unsure it is good. [/ QUOTE ] WTF He's raising 17%, this is an incredible weak argument. AND it's much easier to find out where u are, if u 3-bet! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 - QQ multiway deep against Unknown and TAG
The unknown in the BB is still in the pot on the turn, it is 3 handed - with the dreaded minreraise preflop. Do you have him on air at this stage?
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 - QQ multiway deep against Unknown and TAG
I havent really read much but his line doesnt really make any sense. The only way I can see him showing up with a better hand here is AA/KK that was to much of a pussy to raise on the flop for some reason
snap call, fist pump, etc edit - ok now i see preflop he doesnt have AA/KK. double snap call |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 - QQ multiway deep against Unknown and TAG
Agreed, I thought we were ahead of TAG on the flop - hence check call the river.
What do you have him on btw? |
|
|