NLSNG bankroll and winrate

[bobdogbobdog]

I know this has been addressed countless number of times, but i feel different people have different opinions on the "optimum" number for these 2 issues. Firstly, what kinda bankroll should u have for each level in terms of buy-ins, considering that you definitely ARE a winning player (winrate 60% & above). Secondly, how many games do u need to have before u can correctly ascertain if you are above mentioned winning player. Is there any maths to go along with the number of games? Just curious. Thanks guys

[PrimordialAA]

ummm plz search, leader should prolly lock this, there is a thread discussing EXACTLY these questions, made by either dboy or TRNixon I believe, search plz

[HokieGreg]

You can be a winning player with less than 60% winrate (obv). 58% winner at 110's is probably a better player than a 60% winner at the 22's.

Please learn to search.

[xSCWx]

Its his first post, you guys are ruthless.

Jay_shark's posts on standard deviation in SNGs are probably the most in depth on the subject of how many games you need to know your true win rate. The opinions on the ideal bankroll vary quite a bit because people's standards vary with it. It depends how willing you are to risk going broke, your winrate, how badly you tilt, etc.

[bobdogbobdog]

Thanks xSCWx ..although i realise yeah ..should've done a search 1st anyhow =) it's all good

[jay_shark]

[ QUOTE ]
You can be a winning player with less than 60% winrate (obv). 58% winner at 110's is probably a better player than a 60% winner at the 22's.

Please learn to search.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not only is a 58% winrate in the 110's(10%rake) better than a 60% win rate playing the 22's , but so is a 56.01% win rate in the 110's .

[dboy23]

heres my post about the topic.

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...=0#Post10969932

TNixon has written some good stuff as well. Try to find his posts, and check the sticky.