#1
|
|||
|
|||
NL TRN - 110+5 - Air vs. LAP checked through raised pot
Villain is really strange. He value bet me with a set on our first hand we played, overbet shoved for like 15x a pot a hand later when I made a small bet, but has consistently shown that he goes into check/call mode with anything below top pair.
I've seen him min bet into me once or twice, I'm assuming this means top pair. His preflop min raise can be any 2 but usually he just limps. He is a really weak player. --- Full Tilt Poker Game #3619313523: $110 + $5 Heads Up Sit & Go (27617946), Table 1 - 40/80 - No Limit Hold'em - 10:47:03 ET - 2007/09/20 Seat 1: xSCWx (2,305) Seat 2: PHATTYFOODS7 (695) PHATTYFOODS7 posts the small blind of 40 xSCWx posts the big blind of 80 The button is in seat #2 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to xSCWx [T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]] PHATTYFOODS7 raises to 160 xSCWx calls 80 *** FLOP *** [7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]] xSCWx checks PHATTYFOODS7 checks *** TURN *** [7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]] [5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]] xSCWx checks PHATTYFOODS7 checks *** RIVER *** [7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]] [5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]] xSCWx bets 2,145, and is all in |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL TRN - 110+5 - Air vs. LAP checked through raised pot
Nothing wrong with checking the river if you think you will be called often had you made a bet .
Against a player who is capable of folding , a small river bet is not a bad idea . |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL TRN - 110+5 - Air vs. LAP checked through raised pot
I feel the need to add that we checked through this pretty quickly so it is fairly obvious that we both have [censored]. I wouldn't attempt this unless I found that he was weak, but am I giving too little credit?
PS: He is a break-even player at ~$25 stakes over an 80ish game sample. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL TRN - 110+5 - Air vs. LAP checked through raised pot
If he's trapping you more than 12.9% of the time , then your shove becomes negative EV .
2145:320 ~ 6.7:1 1/(7.7)~12.9% |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL TRN - 110+5 - Air vs. LAP checked through raised pot
[ QUOTE ]
If he's trapping you more than 12.9% of the time , then your shove becomes negative EV . 2145:320 ~ 6.7:1 1/(7.7)~12.9% [/ QUOTE ] He only has 535 in chips at the river. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL TRN - 110+5 - Air vs. LAP checked through raised pot
Ooops :P
|
|
|