Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-18-2007, 11:50 AM
John Kilduff John Kilduff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,903
Default Pragmatically Speaking, Part 2...

Maybe the U./S. should just withdraw from the everlasting hellhole that is the Middle East. Playing policeman forever between Shiites and Sunnis who have been at each others' throats for over a millenia seems a particularly stupid idea.

Iran's nuke sites could be bombed out, if need be, without necessitating an invasion.

Oil drilling could be allowed in the Gulf of Mexico or Caribbean, with enormous reserves, and the reefs or whatever the environmmental concerns are could just take their chances. It seems pretty silly to stay at great risk and expense in the Middle East when plentiful oil reserves are right offshore of the good ol' USA. The struggle and worry for oil in the Middle East are largely unnecessary since the USA could access vast oil reserves offshore (and to a lesser extent in Alaska). Are nearby environmental concerns worth staying in Iraq forever or fighting a coming world war in the Middle East?

Maybe the USA should say screw that entire benighted region and stop worrying about that oil. If they cause too much trouble supporting terrorism, bomb the crap out of the troublemakers. Other than that, leave them to their desert oil and to their infighting forever. It is a region that has been forsaken by God and long the birthplace and homeplace of evil ideologies.

It is incredibly arrogant to think that the USA will be able to lead a liberal democratic reformation in an area that spits on the concept of genuine liberal democratic ideals and spits on the notion of religious liberty or equality. Leave this accursed dustbin to God's judgment and stay out of its troubles and irrationalities.

I'm coming to think that this would might well be the most be the most prudent course and policy for the USA. Comments?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-18-2007, 03:13 PM
PLOlover PLOlover is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,465
Default Re: Pragmatically Speaking, Part 2...

well the point about controlling the oil is restricting it's use, so if US left ME and let them pump pump and US started pumping alaska and stuff that would be the opposite of what they're doing now.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-18-2007, 03:35 PM
ALawPoker ALawPoker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,646
Default Re: Pragmatically Speaking, Part 2...

Sounds reasonable enough to me. Certainly more so than current policies.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.