Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-10-2007, 09:25 AM
KitCloudkicker KitCloudkicker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Nittiest LAG Ever
Posts: 2,366
Default So this hand is pretty standard imo

7 handed 10/20.

2 limpers. 1st limper seems weak tight, second is loose-passive.

I raise black hellmuths (99) in CO. button (loose passive) calls. Blinds fold, limpers call.

Flop is J [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]

Weak tightie bets. next guy folds. I raise with the button left to act.

Yes?

Or better to just call all 3 streets?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-10-2007, 09:35 AM
leprous_hand leprous_hand is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: grinding short-handed LHE
Posts: 62
Default Re: So this hand is pretty standard imo

I like everything about the raise. You are getting value from a flush draw and may discover if you are facing an overpair.

my only concern is does our weak tight lead here with QJ,TJ, KJ etc against the flush draw?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-10-2007, 09:39 AM
KitCloudkicker KitCloudkicker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Nittiest LAG Ever
Posts: 2,366
Default Re: So this hand is pretty standard imo

[ QUOTE ]
You are getting value from a flush draw


[/ QUOTE ]

not sure about that.

i honestly was torn between raising this or calling it. if the button wasnt behind me i'd definitely just call.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-10-2007, 10:18 AM
leprous_hand leprous_hand is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: grinding short-handed LHE
Posts: 62
Default Re: So this hand is pretty standard imo

yeah ... i always seem to err on the side of betting/raising... I usually feel if it was a mistake someone always puts me on spew later
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-10-2007, 10:49 AM
Man of Means Man of Means is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 1,244
Default Re: So this hand is pretty standard imo

Is this Foxwoods?

The villain in question is described as "weak tight" -- does he raise TT+ preflop? If not, then his range is pretty much trip J's, lower two-pairs and big flush draws. As such, you want to see a showdown unless the board drops an obvious turd.

I think raising this flop is fine but can you trust a 3-bet to tell you you're beat or do you just call down at that point?

You might also consider call flop, fsdr turn.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-10-2007, 11:06 AM
KitCloudkicker KitCloudkicker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Nittiest LAG Ever
Posts: 2,366
Default Re: So this hand is pretty standard imo

[ QUOTE ]


You might also consider call flop, fsdr turn.

[/ QUOTE ]

its borgota 10/20.

why fsdr? i would consider it with a hand like 33, trying to get better PP's to fold, but 99?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-10-2007, 01:14 PM
Man of Means Man of Means is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 1,244
Default Re: So this hand is pretty standard imo

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


You might also consider call flop, fsdr turn.

[/ QUOTE ]

why fsdr? i would consider it with a hand like 33, trying to get better PP's to fold, but 99?

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe.

1) I don't think mid pp's fold, thats partly why you do it. But you balance this move with semibluff and pure value raises where you wait for the turn (say you had a J and wanted to slowplay)
2) Get value/protection vs 5 with OC kicker.
3) Get value from Flush draw, make bets go in when you're further ahead. As opposed to 2-3 bets on flop, and probably 1 big bet unless he gets there.
4) Easy fold to 3b vs a weaktight

5) 33 you might be more likely to raise flop with b/c folding button out is more urgent (i.e. 6-outers he may be tempted to call w/ 76, 64, A8 etc.)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-10-2007, 03:03 PM
Xhad Xhad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: .25/.50 6max - stars
Posts: 5,289
Default Re: So this hand is pretty standard imo

[ QUOTE ]
why fsdr? i would consider it with a hand like 33, trying to get better PP's to fold, but 99?

[/ QUOTE ]

Either raising flop or turn has some chance of folding overcards. If you make the flop donker fold overcards on a brick turn you're better off.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-10-2007, 05:23 PM
TheCount212 TheCount212 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: the desert
Posts: 681
Default Re: So this hand is pretty standard imo

I only play 3/6 Kit, so take this for what it's worth..

but IMO a true weak-tightie is not going to bet out at this flop without holding a J. Ever. (In fact, they usually don't bet out at any flops unless they've got at least TP.) They wouldn't dream of checking/slowplaying this because they want to take the pot right now. They wouldn't bet with merely a flush draw because they want to play as cheaply as possible until the third heart hits, and then they'll come out donking. My guess is you have a 3 outer here, needing either the case J or a 9 for your boat.
Of course, by raising you insure that a true W-T will check to you on the turn, earning you a free card. But if you don't catch that 9 or J and W-T bets out again I am instamucking.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-10-2007, 05:29 PM
WhiteKnight WhiteKnight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: omotive
Posts: 316
Default Re: So this hand is pretty standard imo

The Count: Do you discredit villain's likelihood of holding a J if a third comes on the turn? We may fill up to a boat, but if you still give him credit for the J then he has quads right?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.