#1
|
|||
|
|||
NL100: Under Full House -- call massive overbet?
Villain is 15/8/2.75 over about 50 hands. Haven't seem him do much or get out of line. My image is kind of LAG, although I don't think he's seen me do anything particularly significant.
Poker Stars - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.50/$1 Blinds - 6 Players - (LegoPoker Hand History Converter) Hero (SB): $147.25 BB: $141.10 UTG: $213.85 MP: $192.15 CO: $38.35 BTN: $59.40 Preflop: Hero is dealt 4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (6 Players) UTG calls $1.00, MP folds, CO calls $1.00, BTN calls $1.00, Hero calls $0.50, BB checks Flop: ($5) 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (5 Players) <font color="red">Hero bets $4.50</font>, BB calls $4.50, 3 folds Turn: ($14) 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (2 Players) Hero checks, BB checks River: ($14) 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players) <font color="red">Hero bets $6.00</font>, <font color="red">BB raises all-in to $135.60</font>, Hero ??? I'm going to sleep now, but will check back in the morning. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: Under Full House -- call massive overbet?
This goes under SSNL I believe.
I'd assume villain doesn't have 44, 77, or else he would've probably raised that coordinated of a flop. He might have straight draw, slight overpair, or flush draw. Your river bet looks super weak, I don't know why you wouldn't be closer to full pot. I'd probably call here, seeing as how it's not likely he had a set on the flop, the board is very very coordinated with flushes and straights everywhere, and your river bet is very weak. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: Under Full House -- call massive overbet?
Oh, that's right, I forgot 100NL goes in SSNL. Thanks.
I was hoping my bet would look like a blocking bet, and he might raise me -- just not that much. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: Under Full House -- call massive overbet?
And its not 68 either, I think he would bet the turn with that. So I call here.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: Under Full House -- call massive overbet?
***bump for a.m. crowd***
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: Under Full House -- call massive overbet?
Snap call. This could easilly be a flush, a naked 5, or 59, if he has 67,77,or88, then good for him but i snap this
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: Under Full House -- call massive overbet?
I let it go. No way I go broke on this board for 1.5BI with a small boat against TAG BB in a limped pot.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: Under Full House -- call massive overbet?
Also fwiw your table selection doesnt look great. 2 shorties and 2 deep stacks
/ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: Under Full House -- call massive overbet?
[ QUOTE ]
Also fwiw your table selection doesnt look great. 2 shorties and 2 deep stacks / [/ QUOTE ] 4 people over 150bbs 2 people under 50bbs, my guess is that someone just won a big pot, regardless this is fine table selection based on stack sizes, what makes the selection is if those big stacks are total nit tags, good lags, or total fish. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: Under Full House -- call massive overbet?
[ QUOTE ]
Also fwiw your table selection doesnt look great. 2 shorties and 2 deep stacks / [/ QUOTE ] There were some pretty bad players at the table, with a high % seeing the flop, etc. |
|
|