Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-22-2007, 01:57 AM
Stonewalled Stonewalled is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Turned into a Newt, better now
Posts: 769
Default NL100: Under Full House -- call massive overbet?

Villain is 15/8/2.75 over about 50 hands. Haven't seem him do much or get out of line. My image is kind of LAG, although I don't think he's seen me do anything particularly significant.

Poker Stars - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.50/$1 Blinds - 6 Players - (LegoPoker Hand History Converter)

Hero (SB): $147.25
BB: $141.10
UTG: $213.85
MP: $192.15
CO: $38.35
BTN: $59.40

Preflop: Hero is dealt 4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (6 Players)
UTG calls $1.00, MP folds, CO calls $1.00, BTN calls $1.00, Hero calls $0.50, BB checks

Flop: ($5) 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (5 Players)
<font color="red">Hero bets $4.50</font>, BB calls $4.50, 3 folds

Turn: ($14) 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (2 Players)
Hero checks, BB checks

River: ($14) 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players)
<font color="red">Hero bets $6.00</font>, <font color="red">BB raises all-in to $135.60</font>, Hero ???

I'm going to sleep now, but will check back in the morning.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-22-2007, 02:01 AM
PinkMartini PinkMartini is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hidin\' Out
Posts: 232
Default Re: NL100: Under Full House -- call massive overbet?

This goes under SSNL I believe.

I'd assume villain doesn't have 44, 77, or else he would've probably raised that coordinated of a flop. He might have straight draw, slight overpair, or flush draw.
Your river bet looks super weak, I don't know why you wouldn't be closer to full pot. I'd probably call here, seeing as how it's not likely he had a set on the flop, the board is very very coordinated with flushes and straights everywhere, and your river bet is very weak.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-22-2007, 02:08 AM
Stonewalled Stonewalled is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Turned into a Newt, better now
Posts: 769
Default Re: NL100: Under Full House -- call massive overbet?

Oh, that's right, I forgot 100NL goes in SSNL. Thanks.

I was hoping my bet would look like a blocking bet, and he might raise me -- just not that much.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-22-2007, 02:08 AM
Jw513 Jw513 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 298
Default Re: NL100: Under Full House -- call massive overbet?

And its not 68 either, I think he would bet the turn with that. So I call here.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-22-2007, 09:19 AM
Stonewalled Stonewalled is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Turned into a Newt, better now
Posts: 769
Default Re: NL100: Under Full House -- call massive overbet?

***bump for a.m. crowd***
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-22-2007, 09:21 AM
LOLDONKBETZ LOLDONKBETZ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 116
Default Re: NL100: Under Full House -- call massive overbet?

Snap call. This could easilly be a flush, a naked 5, or 59, if he has 67,77,or88, then good for him but i snap this
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-22-2007, 09:25 AM
corsakh corsakh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kitty said what?
Posts: 3,991
Default Re: NL100: Under Full House -- call massive overbet?

I let it go. No way I go broke on this board for 1.5BI with a small boat against TAG BB in a limped pot.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-22-2007, 09:27 AM
hennnerz hennnerz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UWE, Bristol
Posts: 1,208
Default Re: NL100: Under Full House -- call massive overbet?

Also fwiw your table selection doesnt look great. 2 shorties and 2 deep stacks
/
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-22-2007, 09:29 AM
LOLDONKBETZ LOLDONKBETZ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 116
Default Re: NL100: Under Full House -- call massive overbet?

[ QUOTE ]
Also fwiw your table selection doesnt look great. 2 shorties and 2 deep stacks
/

[/ QUOTE ]

4 people over 150bbs
2 people under 50bbs, my guess is that someone just won a big pot, regardless this is fine table selection based on stack sizes, what makes the selection is if those big stacks are total nit tags, good lags, or total fish.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-22-2007, 09:34 AM
Stonewalled Stonewalled is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Turned into a Newt, better now
Posts: 769
Default Re: NL100: Under Full House -- call massive overbet?

[ QUOTE ]
Also fwiw your table selection doesnt look great. 2 shorties and 2 deep stacks
/

[/ QUOTE ]

There were some pretty bad players at the table, with a high % seeing the flop, etc.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.