Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Gambling > Probability
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-09-2007, 02:12 PM
theblitz theblitz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Israel
Posts: 1,920
Default A Talmudic expectancy question

An interesting expectancy question came up today when studying a section in the Talmud. Maybe someone here can calculate the numbers for me.

Background first:

By Jewish law if a guy dies without kids then his brother must marry the widow or perform what is know as "Halitza" which is a sort of divorce ceremony. Until he does this she is not permitted to marry anyone else.
If he does the Halitza she may then marry anyone else EXCEPT for him.

So, the following weird case was discussed.

We have 5 unrelated guys each of whom has a brother. However, though we know who all the 5 brothers are, we do not know which one is the brother of which.
The first 5 guys all die.
How do we solve the problem so that all the widows can get married?

The Talmud gives 2 possible solutions:

1. Each of the guys will do "Haliza" to 4 of the widows and marry a fifth. Obviously, each widow marries one guy. In this way all the widows are married to a guy. Each of the widows is married to the correct guy or has performed "Haliza" to him and was therefore free to marry anyone.

2. 4 of the guys do "Haliza" to all 5 widows and one guy marries them all. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] In this way we are guaranteed that at least one of the widows has married the correct guy. Since it is considered better to marry rather than perform "Haliza" this might seem to be a better solution.

So, now to the question.

In case 2 it is obvious that the expectancy of "correctly married" women is 1.
What would it be in case 1? It is possible that none would be correct. It is also possible that all would be correct.

How do I calculate this?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-09-2007, 04:57 PM
DiamondDog DiamondDog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 202
Default Re: A Talmudic expectancy question

Is this another one of those deals where we answer a simple question and get a free bible?

The questions are usually easier than this.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-09-2007, 05:52 PM
theblitz theblitz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Israel
Posts: 1,920
Default Re: A Talmudic expectancy question

LOL.

Na - this is serious. We were studying this and were trying to figure out the mathematics for it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-09-2007, 05:53 PM
BruceZ BruceZ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,078
Default Re: A Talmudic expectancy question

[ QUOTE ]
An interesting expectancy question came up today when studying a section in the Talmud. Maybe someone here can calculate the numbers for me.

Background first:

By Jewish law if a guy dies without kids then his brother must marry the widow or perform what is know as "Halitza" which is a sort of divorce ceremony. Until he does this she is not permitted to marry anyone else.
If he does the Halitza she may then marry anyone else EXCEPT for him.

So, the following weird case was discussed.

We have 5 unrelated guys each of whom has a brother. However, though we know who all the 5 brothers are, we do not know which one is the brother of which.
The first 5 guys all die.
How do we solve the problem so that all the widows can get married?

The Talmud gives 2 possible solutions:

1. Each of the guys will do "Haliza" to 4 of the widows and marry a fifth. Obviously, each widow marries one guy. In this way all the widows are married to a guy. Each of the widows is married to the correct guy or has performed "Haliza" to him and was therefore free to marry anyone.

2. 4 of the guys do "Haliza" to all 5 widows and one guy marries them all. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] In this way we are guaranteed that at least one of the widows has married the correct guy. Since it is considered better to marry rather than perform "Haliza" this might seem to be a better solution.

So, now to the question.

In case 2 it is obvious that the expectancy of "correctly married" women is 1.
What would it be in case 1? It is possible that none would be correct. It is also possible that all would be correct.

How do I calculate this?

[/ QUOTE ]

The probability that each woman marries correctly is 1/5, so the expected value is simply the sum of these probabilities or 1.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-09-2007, 07:38 PM
theblitz theblitz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Israel
Posts: 1,920
Default Re: A Talmudic expectancy question

[ QUOTE ]


The probability that each woman marries correctly is 1/5, so the expected value is simply the sum of these probabilities or 1.

[/ QUOTE ]
Makes sense.
So, in fact, the two options give the same result.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-10-2007, 05:02 PM
Silent A Silent A is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: out of the grid
Posts: 2,838
Default Re: A Talmudic expectancy question

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


The probability that each woman marries correctly is 1/5, so the expected value is simply the sum of these probabilities or 1.

[/ QUOTE ]
Makes sense.
So, in fact, the two options give the same result.

[/ QUOTE ]

Actually, you're going to have to be a lot more clear about what a "correct" marriage is.

Your methodology seems to assume that there is one uniquely correct man for each woman, and vice versa. It also assumes that the men and women themselves can't figure this out on their own.

However, if we assume that the men and women would pair off at random, and that all "incorrect" marriages are equally valueless, then the average results would be the same: 1 correct marriage and 4 incorrect marriages.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-16-2007, 08:05 AM
theblitz theblitz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Israel
Posts: 1,920
Default Re: A Talmudic expectancy question

[ QUOTE ]

Actually, you're going to have to be a lot more clear about what a "correct" marriage is.

[/ QUOTE ]
The definition of "correct" is marrying the late brother's wife.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.