Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > STT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-07-2007, 12:56 PM
IcemanDan IcemanDan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 83
Default Theory Question : Unexploitable Plays

In z32's article where he walks through a 110, he mentions on hand 63 that pushing KTo from the button is an unexploitable play.

I guess I understand what this means (blinds call too wide = win more showdowns, blinds call too tight = take down blinds often enough to more than compensate for being behind when called), but I'm not seeing how to recognize when these situations arise.

Is there some sort of sweet spot for stack sizes/calling ranges that leads to unexploitable situations? Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-07-2007, 12:59 PM
ledders07 ledders07 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: suburban knight
Posts: 566
Default Re: Theory Question : Unexploitable Plays

i was thinking the exact same thing when i read it
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-07-2007, 12:59 PM
johnnyknish johnnyknish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 177
Default Re: Theory Question : Unexploitable Plays

the sweet spot is very situational which is what the ICM calculations and sit n go wiz are for. generally however your looking to push hands when you have 10bb or less. you have to be able to read your opponets genral hand ranges for calling. then you have to decide if the all in is worth the risk. once again though it depends on position and oyur stack size, and also your opponets ranges.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-07-2007, 01:09 PM
sence25 sence25 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Party
Posts: 1,459
Default Re: Theory Question : Unexploitable Plays

in this case it seems like it doesn't depend on ranges, johnny.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-07-2007, 01:13 PM
JoeSchmo JoeSchmo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 237
Default Re: Theory Question : Unexploitable Plays

[ QUOTE ]
the sweet spot is very situational which is what the ICM calculations and sit n go wiz are for. generally however your looking to push hands when you have 10bb or less. you have to be able to read your opponets genral hand ranges for calling. then you have to decide if the all in is worth the risk. once again though it depends on position and oyur stack size, and also your opponets ranges.

[/ QUOTE ]

Your post is spot on in general about late game play. However, unexploitable plays like the OP is looking for, are what they are because your opponents' ranges don't matter.

OP, think of it as when your hand is so good, opponents to act are so few, and stacks are so small that there is nothing they can do to keep you from gaining EV by pushing.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-07-2007, 01:27 PM
johnnyknish johnnyknish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 177
Default Re: Theory Question : Unexploitable Plays

AHH so its more like a hand thats pretty strong that either a call or a fold it does not matter. which would in that case probably include hands like QJ J10. all hands that have a fairly decent chance of winning an all in against your opponets ranges
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-07-2007, 01:37 PM
splashpot splashpot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: splashing
Posts: 5,852
Default Re: Theory Question : Unexploitable Plays

It's a hand that is a push no matter what your opponent's calling range is. Even if he calls 100% of the time, your best move is still push.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-07-2007, 02:20 PM
IcemanDan IcemanDan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 83
Default Re: Theory Question : Unexploitable Plays

[ QUOTE ]
It's a hand that is a push no matter what your opponent's calling range is. Even if he calls 100% of the time, your best move is still push.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hm, ok. That makes sense. So that would mean the very best hands are unexploitable when the stacks are big, and then that range grows as blinds increase and opponent stack sizes decrease?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-07-2007, 02:45 PM
splashpot splashpot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: splashing
Posts: 5,852
Default Re: Theory Question : Unexploitable Plays

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
It's a hand that is a push no matter what your opponent's calling range is. Even if he calls 100% of the time, your best move is still push.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hm, ok. That makes sense. So that would mean the very best hands are unexploitable when the stacks are big, and then that range grows as blinds increase and opponent stack sizes decrease?

[/ QUOTE ]
Uhh, kinda. No hands are unexploitable when the stacks are big. For example it would be foolish to push level 1 with AA. You are right, however, about more hands becoming unexploitable as the stacks get smaller and blinds get bigger. But, usually blinds have to VERY big in comparison to the stacks for an unexploitable situation to occur.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-07-2007, 03:56 PM
JoeSchmo JoeSchmo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 237
Default Re: Theory Question : Unexploitable Plays

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
It's a hand that is a push no matter what your opponent's calling range is. Even if he calls 100% of the time, your best move is still push.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hm, ok. That makes sense. So that would mean the very best hands are unexploitable when the stacks are big, and then that range grows as blinds increase and opponent stack sizes decrease?

[/ QUOTE ]
Uhh, kinda. No hands are unexploitable when the stacks are big. For example it would be foolish to push level 1 with AA. You are right, however, about more hands becoming unexploitable as the stacks get smaller and blinds get bigger. But, usually blinds have to VERY big in comparison to the stacks for an unexploitable situation to occur.

[/ QUOTE ]

Just because it's not the most EV play doesn't make something exploitable. For instance, pushing AA (and prob. KK-QQ) in level 1 of a SNG is unexploitable. This is just semantics though mostly. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.