|
|
#1
07-27-2007, 01:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
How long would it take to move from NL 100 to NL200
Just out of curiousity. im playing at nl100, and i hope i can move up soon, just wondering how long it usually takes so for those who play nl200 and above, how long did it take you to move up from 100 to 200? what is your hourly earning rate?and your BR? thx
also what are the biggest difference between nl100 and nl200 FR? 
|
|
#3
07-27-2007, 01:45 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How long would it take to move from NL 100 to NL200
Tis all the same really. Just a tad bit better players. Move up as soon as possible so you can get to baller status sooner. If you have 4 or 5 k you are good. Move back down at 2k. Other than that just keep working at it and dont feel like you wont ever make it there.
|
|
#5
07-27-2007, 03:42 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How long would it take to move from NL 100 to NL200
Don't. Do. It. God. Trust. Me.
|
|
#6
07-27-2007, 05:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How long would it take to move from NL 100 to NL200
I didn't play many hands at NL100 simply because I accidently won a tournament and increased my bankroll from $2500 to $6500. Moved to NL200 and found out competition was quite awful there too, and I'm still playing NL200 despite now only having a $4000 roll after a recent withdrawal. Haven't even had two consecutive losing sessions in July, and it certainly helps to have AA holding up every single time this month (can't believe I just wrote this, I'm jinxed). Because competiton is mediocre, I'm gonna keep playing at NL200 until BR goes below $3K.
|
|
#8
07-27-2007, 06:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How long would it take to move from NL 100 to NL200
[ QUOTE ]
competition was quite awful there too [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Because competiton is mediocre [/ QUOTE ] Most $100 players moving up will not find this. It is true that the standard at $200 is not dramatically better than at $100, but only very good players, capable of winning much higher than $200, will find the general standard "awful". It's all relative. When I moved up, I found that a few of the regulars were better than me, whereas I didn't feel this way in the $100. The $200 game is the first level where I was regularly put in tricky spots: more 3 betting pre-flop, more floating of CBs, more raising of CBs etc. IMO, at $100 you can play your own cards and win; at $200 you have to outplay your opponents (at least the better ones). An example hand I am 16/10, Villain is similar and a tricky winning regular, $200 stacks My HUD tells me that Villain calls and raises CBs a lot. Hero is dealt T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 6 folds Hero raises to $8 Villain calls from Button Blinds fold Flop - J [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 7 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 3 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] Hero bets $13 Villain raises to $30 Hero re-raises to $80 Villain pushes Hero folds Villain shows Q [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] J [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
|
|
#9
07-27-2007, 06:42 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How long would it take to move from NL 100 to NL200
[ QUOTE ]
Don't. Do. It. God. Trust. Me. [/ QUOTE ] this is the right answer
|
|
#10
07-27-2007, 06:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How long would it take to move from NL 100 to NL200
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] competition was quite awful there too [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Because competiton is mediocre [/ QUOTE ] Most $100 players moving up will not find this. It is true that the standard at $200 is not dramatically better than at $100, but only very good players, capable of winning much higher than $200, will find the general standard "awful". It's all relative. [/ QUOTE ] Yes, you're right in a way. The competition is slightly better because the regulars are somewhat trickier. But the bad players are just as awful at NL200. In general, I switch table if I find TAG regs to my left (unless the rest of the table is juicy, of course) and I try not to battle against them. So, avoid certain players, and NL200 is actually not harder than NL100.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
