Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > High Stakes MTT
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-22-2007, 05:45 PM
bigchips HI bigchips HI is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 18
Default could i have played this better? 44 deep vs LP opener

exactly on money bubble, villian just doubled up shoving 77 from EP with 13bb's and getting called by KQ. table is playing tight passive.

I dont think I considered the risk vs reward enough here. would love to hear what some of you tend to do in spots like this... fold pf?

Seat 1: RasA86 (12520 in chips)
Seat 2: lil riffy (16544 in chips)
Seat 3: SevenToes (20515 in chips) <-----VILLIAN
Seat 5: caligastor (16231 in chips)
Seat 6: bigchipshi (51880 in chips) <-----ME, top 5 stack
Seat 7: fussel101 (5292 in chips)
Seat 8: Pelsen85 (30055 in chips)
Seat 9: j.thaddeus (31495 in chips)


RasA86: posts the ante 100
lil riffy: posts the ante 100
SevenToes: posts the ante 100
caligastor: posts the ante 100
bigchipshi: posts the ante 100
fussel101: posts the ante 100
Pelsen85: posts the ante 100
j.thaddeus: posts the ante 100
bigchipshi: posts small blind 500
fussel101: posts big blind 1000


*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to bigchipshi [4s 4d]
Pelsen85: folds
j.thaddeus: folds
RasA86: folds
lil riffy: folds
SevenToes: raises 4000 to 5000
caligastor: folds
bigchipshi: raises to 25,000
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-22-2007, 05:57 PM
imabigdeal imabigdeal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hating shortstackers
Posts: 1,008
Default Re: could i have played this better? 44 deep vs LP opener

i like it except when he snap calls with KK. lol, seriously though i like it for the obvious reason that you're on the money bubble and that could cause him to lay down a hand he otherwise might call with. even if you lose, you still have over 30k... and if he calls and you win you're monster stack. as for you fold pf question, i would absolutely never do this, i think calling and set mining or pushing a crap flop would be ok also. again i would push though
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-23-2007, 01:35 AM
illini43 illini43 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Leman for Heisman
Posts: 2,358
Default Re: could i have played this better? 44 deep vs LP opener

Let's do a little math:

Let's say he is raising 77+,ATs+,KQs,AJo+,KQo. If you re-raise him all-in, let's say he will call with the top ~44% of THAT range, so: TT+,AQs+,AKo.

Ok, so if he is raising with that range, he will fold about 56% of the time and you will win his 5000 chips raise + 2300 chips already in the pot (let's ignore the BB's chips if he wakes up with AA for simplicity sake). So, 56% of the time you make this raise, he will fold and you will win 7300 chips.

44% of the time he will call. He will call with the hands in this range: TT+,AQs+,AKo, and 32% of the time you will win the pot, while 68% of the time you will lose.

So, when you win the pot, you will win an additional 22800 chips and add them to your stack. When you lose, you will lose ~20000 chips.

So:

.32 x 22800 = 7296

.68 x 20000 = 13600

The 44% of the time you get called, you will have a net chips expectation of (7296 - 13600) or -6304.

The 56% of the time you win the pot, you will win 7300 chips.

So, on average, this move has an expectation of:

.56 x 7300 = 4088

.44 x -6304 = -2773.

Overall, you have a net gain of ~1315 chips by making this move.

This math might be alittle sloppy because I am going to sleep and I haven't read HOH2 in awhile.

So basically, a push is +cEV and has extra meaning because it is on the bubble.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-23-2007, 02:18 AM
gobboboy gobboboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Missing wraps.
Posts: 4,836
Default Re: could i have played this better? 44 deep vs LP opener

Your open raise size is disgusting. you have no reason to make it 5x. Once you make it this big, fold, his resteal range against you isn't very big.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-23-2007, 02:19 AM
imabigdeal imabigdeal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hating shortstackers
Posts: 1,008
Default Re: could i have played this better? 44 deep vs LP opener

[ QUOTE ]
Your open raise size is disgusting. you have no reason to make it 5x. Once you make it this big, fold, his resteal range against you isn't very big.

[/ QUOTE ]

gobboboy you mixed up villain and hero
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-23-2007, 03:18 AM
THEOSU THEOSU is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: being awesome. duh.
Posts: 7,784
Default Re: could i have played this better? 44 deep vs LP opener

this is what the bubble's for.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-23-2007, 04:16 AM
ZJ123 ZJ123 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Naptown, Maryland
Posts: 3,021
Default Re: could i have played this better? 44 deep vs LP opener

standard.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-23-2007, 04:45 AM
DeMaci DeMaci is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Orange County
Posts: 855
Default Re: could i have played this better? 44 deep vs LP opener

Seems totally standard.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-23-2007, 04:53 AM
8Adam8 8Adam8 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Waterloo
Posts: 793
Default Re: could i have played this better? 44 deep vs LP opener

fold to additional 515 chip raise though
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-23-2007, 10:46 AM
betgo betgo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 15,430
Default Re: could i have played this better? 44 deep vs LP opener

I would fold. The 5xBB for 1/4 of his stack is a subtle hint villain isn't folding to a reraise, and it is about 50% he has a higher pp.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.