#1
|
|||
|
|||
$600 NL: Deep Stacks, AKs versus H@llinggol
Limper UTG is a huge fish. Hallinggol is playing 41/23 over 91 hands... and his rep is hyper aggressive. How is my play? I'm trying to make it look like I've got QQ+ playing for pot control.
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $6 BB (5 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums) BB ($565.95) UTG ($706.70) MP ($1470.40) Button ($627) wpr101 ($1969.10) Preflop: wpr101 is SB with A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. UTG calls $6, <font color="#CC3333">MP raises to $30</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">wpr101 raises to $122</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, UTG folds, MP calls $92. Flop: ($256) 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> wpr101 checks, MP checks. Turn: ($256) T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">wpr101 bets $200</font> |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $600 NL: Deep Stacks, AKs versus H@llinggol
After he checks behind on the flop i suspect him to call or raise a lot of the time here on the turn. You're mostly gonna have to fire the river as well to have a chance of getting him off of any pair. For these reasons i don't like it.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $600 NL: Deep Stacks, AKs versus H@llinggol
I think it's really bad if you're not going to bet the river.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $600 NL: Deep Stacks, AKs versus H@llinggol
yes what IS ur river plan?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $600 NL: Deep Stacks, AKs versus H@llinggol
[ QUOTE ]
yes what IS ur river plan? [/ QUOTE ] I'm not sure honestly. Do you have a strong preference? Does it change at all depending on what card comes? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $600 NL: Deep Stacks, AKs versus H@llinggol
its not good to make this play w/o having a plan imo. id just fire flop. also i doubt he thinks you would check flop here with QQ+ for pot control vs someone who is playing very smartLAG
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $600 NL: Deep Stacks, AKs versus H@llinggol
[ QUOTE ]
its not good to make this play w/o having a plan imo. id just fire flop. also i doubt he thinks you would check flop here with QQ+ for pot control vs someone who is playing very smartLAG [/ QUOTE ] So is the turn bet bad, and what should I do on the river if I bet it? I don't think any of us can honestly say we always have a plan 1 or 2 streets ahead... it's easy to say I should have had a plan in retrospect. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $600 NL: Deep Stacks, AKs versus H@llinggol
check turn call river IMO way better
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $600 NL: Deep Stacks, AKs versus H@llinggol
[ QUOTE ]
I don't think any of us can honestly say we always have a plan 1 or 2 streets ahead... it's easy to say I should have had a plan in retrospect. [/ QUOTE ] this seems really bad, I'm not trying to make myself look good, but I always have a plan from flop/river. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $600 NL: Deep Stacks, AKs versus H@llinggol
[ QUOTE ]
check turn call river IMO way better [/ QUOTE ] Interesting line to take, what about if he fires the river again? ... Now EmpireMaker2 is at my table. It's literally the high stakes player buston table. |
|
|