#1
|
|||
|
|||
NL50 - AA c/r\'d on flop
Villian is unknown.
Looks like I have to give him credit for a set here considering the limp/call preflop and the relatively dry board; or am I being too nitty? Calling the min-raise to reevaluate on turn is fine, no? Poker Stars - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.25/$0.50 Blinds - 9 Players - (LegoPoker HH Converter) SB: $56.55 BB: $38.65 UTG: $69.15 UTG+1: $47.00 MP1: $11.25 MP2: $37.80 MP3: $20.45 Hero (CO): $50.00 BTN: $29.25 Preflop: Hero is dealt A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (9 Players) UTG folds, UTG+1 calls $0.50, 2 folds, MP3 calls $0.50, <font color="red">Hero raises to $3.00</font>, 3 folds, UTG+1 calls $2.50, MP3 folds Flop: ($7.25) 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (2 Players) UTG+1 checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $5.00</font>, <font color="red">UTG+1 raises to $10.50</font>, Hero calls $5.50 Turn: ($28.25) 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players) <font color="red">UTG+1 bets $25.00</font>, |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50 - AA c/r\'d on flop
This is played fine. I think I fold turn.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50 - AA c/r\'d on flop
check behind flop. Do not feareth the 5 outers. If he checks turn bet 1/2 pot for value, if he leads you simply call.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50 - AA c/r\'d on flop
AC,
If we check behind on flops like this with the goods, doesn't it kinda ruin our ability to c'bet with air on the same kind of flop? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50 - AA c/r\'d on flop
[ QUOTE ]
AC, If we check behind on flops like this with the goods, doesn't it kinda ruin our ability to c'bet with air on the same kind of flop? [/ QUOTE ] Against regulars maybe, but he is an unknown. And the multi-tabling regulars may not even be paying attention to this hand. Also it is the rare full ring nit that will check/raise your CB's with air. And the others are too dumb to fathom your pot control checking behind with AA "omgz he didn't protect his hand!!" |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50 - AA c/r\'d on flop
Also his most likely hand is a pocket pair to limp/call. If that's the case he's either got a set or drawing to 2 outs. It seems standard way ahead/behind to me. I would also like to see showdown to get info on this unknown player. I fear what is unknown.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50 - AA c/r\'d on flop
[ QUOTE ]
Also his most likely hand is a pocket pair to limp/call. [/ QUOTE ] I disagree with this against an unknown. I'm not hell bent on betting flop being better then checking, but I do know I'd puke if the turn came a ten, jack, queen and villain bet into me. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50 - AA c/r\'d on flop
[ QUOTE ]
This is played fine. I think I fold turn. [/ QUOTE ] |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50 - AA c/r\'d on flop
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Also his most likely hand is a pocket pair to limp/call. [/ QUOTE ] I disagree with this against an unknown. I'm not hell bent on betting flop being better then checking, but I do know I'd puke if the turn came a ten, jack, queen and villain bet into me. [/ QUOTE ] Because he could have QJ,QT,KJ,JT. These aren't more likely than a pocket pair. But if you are going to put him a range of just about everything then it should be even more important to you to want to see what he limp/calls in EP. And checking the flop will get to showdown most cheaply. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50 - AA c/r\'d on flop
[ QUOTE ]
check behind flop [/ QUOTE ] Results oriented, betting here is soooo standard, and checking should be done rarely for metagame purposes agains't regulars. |
|
|