|
|
#1
06-18-2007, 03:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Hellmuth Bias At WSOP
Hiya folks,
It has occurred to me that there is an unintentional bias towards Phil Hellmuth in his quest for WSOP bracelets. Simply, he is a Hold'em specialist and Hold'em events dominate the WSOP and in this regard he has the edge over Doyle Brunson and Johnny Chan. How big this edge is, I am not sure. 
|
|
#4
06-18-2007, 04:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Hellmuth Bias At WSOP
seems to me that if you could play more games you could win more bracelets. I am going to have to go with the above posters on this one
|
|
#5
06-18-2007, 04:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Hellmuth Bias At WSOP
another variable is the competing number of holdem 'experts' out there
|
|
#6
06-18-2007, 04:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Hellmuth Bias At WSOP
...and smaller fields in the 'other' games
|
|
#7
06-18-2007, 04:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Hellmuth Bias At WSOP
I'm with the others
Being a hold em only specialist is actually more of a handicap than being a player who is still pretty awesome at hold em (Chan/Brunson) and also awesome in other games (with much smaller fields)
|
|
#9
06-18-2007, 05:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Hellmuth Bias At WSOP
Just when you thought you had heard it all.
|
|
#10
06-18-2007, 05:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Hellmuth Bias At WSOP
[ QUOTE ]
Just when you thought you had heard it all. [/ QUOTE ] Johnny come lately following the crowd like the sheep you are, how could have heard it all being such a newbie with 157 posts.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
