Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-05-2007, 10:13 AM
jetsguy jetsguy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 29
Default Smoking

I know this is toolish but I have an issue with it. In NYC you cannot smoke in buildings and you are technically supposed to go away from the entrance by a specified distance. I think it is 20 feet. However, no one follows the law and everytime I need to leave work I have to walk through a cloud of smoke. Besides all of the harm from secondhand smoke, it is just gross to have to smell.

Since I am a law guy, I looked into some legislation and the regulations for office buildings. The building management is supposed to strictly enforce any smoking violations. They obviously do not.

I sound like a huge nit but I work in different areas of health law and read articles about the effects of smoking (and secondhand smoke) daily. Why do I have to suffer so that people can cause harm to themselves? Do I have any recourse?


Cliff Notes: Smokers outside my building piss me off. What can I do?

Feel free to make fun of me as well.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-05-2007, 10:16 AM
GoodCallYouWin GoodCallYouWin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,070
Default Re: Smoking

"Why do I have to suffer so that people can cause harm to themselves?"

Your idea of suffering is 2 seconds of second hand smoke?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-05-2007, 10:18 AM
Klompy Klompy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bumble[censored] Iowa
Posts: 6,236
Default Re: Smoking

Smoking laws are out of control in places like NYC. You shouldn't do anything but maybe hold your breath for the 2 seconds it takes to walk out of the "cloud" of smoke on your way out.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-05-2007, 10:18 AM
capone0 capone0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,906
Default Re: Smoking

Kick them in the face?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-05-2007, 10:19 AM
kerowo kerowo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,880
Default Re: Smoking

The research on second hand smoke isn't very good, but the govment was convinced it had to do something to protect us, maybe you should start calling the cops on these scofflaws.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-05-2007, 10:23 AM
mbillie1 mbillie1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: crazytown
Posts: 6,665
Default Re: Smoking

Dude, you are the biggest tool ever. Shut the hell up and deal with it.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-05-2007, 10:24 AM
luckyjimm luckyjimm is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: blogging
Posts: 6,106
Default Re: Smoking

It's nits like you who did away with smoking rooms! You created the problem of people being forced to smoke outside, now deal with it!

The firm I worked for moved offices last year to a new build which had a large paved outdoor garden on the 6th floor on the roof leading out from the restaurant. It was the perfect place to smoke - out of the way of the public and clients, and easy to put out ashtrays so not much problem to clean. This was a firm that paid people to wipe the inside of elevators each hour, so the costs would have been minor. Within a week of us moving into the building, smokers realised it was the best place to smoke. Within two weeks, signs appeared banning it. The result was that rather than using the pleasant roof terrace, smokers now have to go outside and stand in the desolate area at front of the building, in full view of arriving clients. It also takes more time to go downstairs and out of the building than to smoke on the terrace. I guess it's an example of trying to engineer smokers out of existence.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-05-2007, 10:25 AM
jetsguy jetsguy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 29
Default Re: Smoking

For any other lawyers/law students, I wanted to include this link from a recent court decision involving an aspect of this type of litigation. The decision is Schwab v. Phillip Morris from 9/25/06.

http://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/Decisio.../doi_2006.html
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-05-2007, 10:52 AM
FilthyLarry FilthyLarry is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: failing life
Posts: 514
Default Re: Smoking

listen closely.....


life is not fair
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-05-2007, 11:31 AM
niss niss is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: yankee the wankee?
Posts: 4,489
Default Re: Smoking

As small an inconvenience as you may perceive it to be for us to have to walk through your stinky cloud of tar and nicotine for 2 seconds, it's even less of an inconvenience for you to to move far enough away from the door so we don't have to.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.