#1
|
|||
|
|||
Are these bona fide Wong teasers?
My first time doing the Wong thing. Do these look good?
01/06/2007 19:30:31 2 Play 6.0 point Teaser: Wagered $275.00 to win $250.00 Unsettled F 79 1/6 DALLAS AT SEATTLE DALLAS +1.5 (+6.0) F 83 1/7 NEW YORK J AT NEW ENGLAND NEW ENGLAND -8.5 (+6.0) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 01/06/2007 19:29:49 2 Play 6.0 point Teaser: Wagered $220.00 to win $200.00 Unsettled F 79 1/6 DALLAS AT SEATTLE SEATTLE -1.5 (+6.0) F 83 1/7 NEW YORK J AT NEW ENGLAND NEW ENGLAND -8.5 (+6.0) Which one is better, the first or the second? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are these bona fide Wong teasers?
the second one is awful. i like the first one.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are these bona fide Wong teasers?
The first one. You want to cross the key numbers of 3 and 7.
So take +1.5 to +7.5, and take -8.5 to -2.5. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are these bona fide Wong teasers?
Bodog has Dallas +3 so you can tease it up to 9.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are these bona fide Wong teasers?
Good call--I just did exactly that. Thanks. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are these bona fide Wong teasers?
but it didn't have -8.5 on the Pats, it was -9. You can only tease that to -3 which sucks.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are these bona fide Wong teasers?
I got 8.5 on the Pats right before I posted.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are these bona fide Wong teasers?
It had 8.5 for me right before kickoff.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are these bona fide Wong teasers?
My bad, I meant on the Cowboys/Seahawks it was only +3/-3 so that side would only be a half-wonger.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are these bona fide Wong teasers?
[ QUOTE ]
My bad, I meant on the Cowboys/Seahawks it was only +3/-3 so that side would only be a half-wonger. [/ QUOTE ] This is not right. |
|
|