![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am looking to purchase an HP dv6000t for college/poker.
For my processor, I am choosing between: Intel(R) Core(TM) 2 Duo T5600(1.83GHz/2MB L2Cache) ($225) and Intel(R) Core(TM) 2 Duo T7200 (2.0GHz/4MB L2Cache) ($325) Which one is a better value and why? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The more expensive one is faster. You probably wouldn't notice unless running them side by side. If you have a crazy big PT DB you may find it marginally faster with the more expensive one.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
the second one has twice the onboard Cache, that is really what you are paying for. That will give a nice boost in memory intensive applications. Peformance per dollar may be better with the cheaper chip, but not by much.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does FTP+PAHUD+PT+Itunes+AHKscript(probably 2-4) qualify as memory intensive?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Might getting the more expensive processor be the difference between FTP LAAAAG and FTP no lag?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have the T5600 in a Dell with 2 GB of RAM and it is very nice. I've had no problem with FTP lag at all, but I also wonder if that might be a problem with your inernet connection, more than processor speed. I would think the T5600 would be plenty, but if the $100 is no problem, go for it. Personally, the T5600 has been great for me and I don't need anything else. I can run FT, PT, PAHUD, iTunes, Photoshop, Firefox, Thunderbird, etc with no problems.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Does FTP+PAHUD+PT+Itunes+AHKscript(probably 2-4) qualify as memory intensive? [/ QUOTE ] It would definitely qualify. For those talking about the FTP lag, I have seen some post that state that if you do not open the cashier window there will not be a lag problem, my bonus expired it so I haven't tried it yet. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
personally, I'd go with the 512MB RAM and the Intel Core 1 Uno...but that's me.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just get the 1st one not worth spending extra 100 bucks for not much more.
|
![]() |
|
|