NL100: Stack-a-donk, but who's the donk?

[EvanJC]

is this a good time for this line? villian is 44/20 over a big sample. he's a little scary aggressive, but definitely not a winning player. this might be standard, i dunno

Full Tilt Poker
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $0.50/$1
5 players
Converter

Stack sizes:
UTG: $30.35
Hero: $98.50
Button: $198.45
SB: $34.15
BB: $30.35

Pre-flop: (5 players) Hero is CO with K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]
UTG folds, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to $4</font>, Button calls, 2 folds.

Flop: 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] ($9.5, 2 players)
<font color="#cc0000">Hero bets $8</font>, Button calls.

Turn: 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ($25.5, 2 players)
Hero checks, <font color="#cc0000">Button bets $22</font>, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises all-in $86.5

[DanJ.]

seems standard.

[fruitypro]

I like it.

[kidcolin]

I'd rather valuebet the whole way. Some Qs actually fold here, as do 99-JJ type hands. They convince themselves to call down on safe flops, though.

[AbreuTime]

Without draws out there, I agree, this line is unnecessary. It may help down the line, if villain loves to float in position.

[Biosludge]

If you have history with this villain, I like this line. For example, if you have been mixing it up with him in pots and making plays I think this line will get paid off by this type of player pretty regularly.

However, if you have been playing pretty solid TAG poker I'd prefer valuebetting the whole way.

[EvanJC]

no history. i think i like valuebetting, in retrospect. say we bet and he plays back on a seemingly blank turn...are we willing to felt this vs an unknown?