Moving In With Deuces

[David Sklansky]

Complete this sentence. With a one dollar ante and a five and ten dollar blind in a ten handed game, you should move in $90 with deuces in the small blind if you are first in (and the big blind has you covered) unless.....

[RichC.]

.....you have x-ray vision and can see the BB has AA.

[nath]

Yeah, I can't think of an unless. Maybe like "unless it's a satellite with one elimination to go and the big blind will be forced all-in the next hand".
I think an "unless" is dependent on knowing your opponent's hole cards. Even if he only calls with overpairs, that means you pick up the pot about 95% of the time, so moving in HAS to be profitable. You would have to know he has an overpair and he's calling for moving in to be a bad play here.

[FortunaMaximus]

Rarest of exceptions would be a Villain who will call with any two in a BvB.

Effectively a HU question.

[Supwithbates]

You're on the bubble of a satellite and will survive without doubling up

[kolotoure]

bb calls with any 2

[nath]

[ QUOTE ]
bb calls with any 2

[/ QUOTE ]
wrong:

Text results appended to pokerstove.txt

12,585,434,400 games 14.171 secs 888,111,946 games/sec

Board:
Dead:

equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 50.3340 % 49.39% 00.95% { 22 }
Hand 2: 49.6660 % 48.72% 00.95% { random }

[Sam T.]

It's a sat that pays nine places, and you're not shorty.

[Supwithbates]

[ QUOTE ]
Rarest of exceptions would be a Villain who will call with any two in a BvB.

Effectively a HU question.

[/ QUOTE ]
I'm pretty sure it would still be profitable... because of hands we dominate like 23, etc.
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 50.3340 % 49.39% 00.95% { 22 }
Hand 2: 49.6660 % 48.72% 00.95% { random }

[kolotoure]

[ QUOTE ]
It's a sat that pays nine places, and you're not shorty.

[/ QUOTE ]

As I was wrong the first time I'm guessing this is the correct answer