#1
|
|||
|
|||
NL50: Is this what you kids refer to as \"pot control\"?
Bodog full-table. No solid reads. I have $39 to start the hand (I just lost $10 the prior hand), the main opponent in the SB has over $60, whereas the CO and Button have $15 and $12 respectively.
Preflop: BB posts $0.50. chesspain is MP with A [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] K [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. 2 folds, <font color="red">chesspain raises to $2</font>, 2 folds, CO calls $2, Button calls $2, SB calls $2, BB folds. Flop: ($8.50) 3 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] A [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] T [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. (4 players) <font color="red">SB bets $0.50,</font> <font color="red">chesspain raises to $5,</font> CO folds, Button folds, SB calls $5. Turn: ($18.50) 7 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] SB checks, chesspain checks. River: ($18.50) 7 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="red">SB bets $3,</font> chesspain calls $3. 1) Any reason to raise more on the flop, especially with two shorties still to act? 2) Is this a proper check-behind on the turn? 3) Should I have min-raised the river? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50: Is this what you kids refer to as \"pot control\"?
Just bet whatever you'd normally bet on the flop. I normally make it at least $6.50 here.
I like the turn check here. The only draw just got there, but you have the nut redraw. I don't raise river, just because I hate reopening the betting. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50: Is this what you kids refer to as \"pot control\"?
1) no
2) I think its fine, I smell a made draw, and if another club falls, you've got yourself some nuts 3) no. NEVER minraise. calling is fine here IMO |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50: Is this what you kids refer to as \"pot control\"?
I dont mind the turn check since we have Kc, but usually I bet here.
River is fine. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50: Is this what you kids refer to as \"pot control\"?
[ QUOTE ]
3) no. NEVER minraise. [/ QUOTE ] This is wrong there's lots of places that min-raising is ok. The problem is that new players usually pick the wrong spots. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50: Is this what you kids refer to as \"pot control\"?
doesn't $3 into a $21 pot seem a bit weak?
Unless he's the type of player that would trap you into a reraise? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50: Is this what you kids refer to as \"pot control\"?
3. Fine
2. Since you have Kc here this is nice check, otherwise I'd bet it. 1. Prolly good raise. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50: Is this what you kids refer to as \"pot control\"?
I see that a lot on lower limits. They bet small to try and Induce a reraise and then go all-in or rereraise.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50: Is this what you kids refer to as \"pot control\"?
looks good, raise more on flop.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50: Is this what you kids refer to as \"pot control\"?
Im raising this to about $8 on the flop. I think he has a weaker ace here more often than the fd, and you have the nut redraw so bet the turn and get value, I like about 2/3 pot here.
|
|
|