Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-19-2006, 07:36 PM
chesspain chesspain is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Southern New Hampshire
Posts: 8,277
Default NL50: Is this what you kids refer to as \"pot control\"?

Bodog full-table. No solid reads. I have $39 to start the hand (I just lost $10 the prior hand), the main opponent in the SB has over $60, whereas the CO and Button have $15 and $12 respectively.

Preflop: BB posts $0.50. chesspain is MP with A [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] K [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img].
2 folds, <font color="red">chesspain raises to $2</font>, 2 folds, CO calls $2, Button calls $2, SB calls $2, BB folds.

Flop: ($8.50) 3 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] A [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] T [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. (4 players)
<font color="red">SB bets $0.50,</font> <font color="red">chesspain raises to $5,</font> CO folds, Button folds, SB calls $5.

Turn: ($18.50) 7 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
SB checks, chesspain checks.

River: ($18.50) 7 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
<font color="red">SB bets $3,</font> chesspain calls $3.

1) Any reason to raise more on the flop, especially with two shorties still to act?
2) Is this a proper check-behind on the turn?
3) Should I have min-raised the river?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-19-2006, 07:41 PM
Jigsaws Jigsaws is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: pumalicious
Posts: 3,768
Default Re: NL50: Is this what you kids refer to as \"pot control\"?

Just bet whatever you'd normally bet on the flop. I normally make it at least $6.50 here.

I like the turn check here. The only draw just got there, but you have the nut redraw.

I don't raise river, just because I hate reopening the betting.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-19-2006, 07:46 PM
rico4 rico4 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Loc:
Posts: 66
Default Re: NL50: Is this what you kids refer to as \"pot control\"?

1) no
2) I think its fine, I smell a made draw, and if another club falls, you've got yourself some nuts
3) no. NEVER minraise. calling is fine here IMO
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-19-2006, 07:51 PM
Shaddux Shaddux is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Duke University
Posts: 1,778
Default Re: NL50: Is this what you kids refer to as \"pot control\"?

I dont mind the turn check since we have Kc, but usually I bet here.

River is fine.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-19-2006, 07:53 PM
mason55 mason55 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: televisiphonernetting
Posts: 10,530
Default Re: NL50: Is this what you kids refer to as \"pot control\"?

[ QUOTE ]
3) no. NEVER minraise.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is wrong there's lots of places that min-raising is ok. The problem is that new players usually pick the wrong spots.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-19-2006, 08:03 PM
michaelantoi michaelantoi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 820
Default Re: NL50: Is this what you kids refer to as \"pot control\"?

doesn't $3 into a $21 pot seem a bit weak?

Unless he's the type of player that would trap you into a reraise?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-19-2006, 08:06 PM
AmonRaa AmonRaa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 465
Default Re: NL50: Is this what you kids refer to as \"pot control\"?

3. Fine
2. Since you have Kc here this is nice check, otherwise I'd bet it.
1. Prolly good raise.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-19-2006, 08:10 PM
IsaacAsimov IsaacAsimov is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 454
Default Re: NL50: Is this what you kids refer to as \"pot control\"?

I see that a lot on lower limits. They bet small to try and Induce a reraise and then go all-in or rereraise.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-19-2006, 08:12 PM
TyFuji TyFuji is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NYU
Posts: 1,420
Default Re: NL50: Is this what you kids refer to as \"pot control\"?

looks good, raise more on flop.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-19-2006, 09:29 PM
deaders deaders is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Perth, AU
Posts: 3,362
Default Re: NL50: Is this what you kids refer to as \"pot control\"?

Im raising this to about $8 on the flop. I think he has a weaker ace here more often than the fd, and you have the nut redraw so bet the turn and get value, I like about 2/3 pot here.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.