Are these stats normal? I lost a lot of money...

[zelwood]

182 hands played and saw flop:
- 17 times out of 33 while in small blind (51%)
- 25 times out of 32 while in big blind (78%)
- 42 times out of 117 in other positions (35%)
- a total of 84 times out of 182 (46%)

Pots won at showdown - 11 out of 19 (57%)
Pots won without showdown - 23
************************************************** **********
Omaha (Real Money):

701 hands played and saw flop:
- 86 times out of 94 while in small blind (91%)
- 84 times out of 93 while in big blind (90%)
- 393 times out of 514 in other positions (76%)
- a total of 563 times out of 701 (80%)

Pots won at showdown - 64 out of 134 (47%)
Pots won without showdown - 161
************************************************** **********

[haz31]

those stats mean little in omaha, you could just be running average, or you could be aweful. Most of the time your only going to be a 60/40 favourite. Your sample set is WAY too small. Post the hands where you lose >80 BB if you want feedback

[beset]

Hey check out this session i just played:



Wait... What is that you say? Did I play other hands over the last 3 days? yeah I did! In fact, here are those hands, INCLUDING the wonderful session cited above!



Basically, omaha variance is crazy. I wouldn't even bother looking to hard at stats for like 50k hands at the minimum. Just focus on the fundamental concepts and ignore the numbers. A few thousand hands are a drop in the atlantic.

But, I can't help but notice you are way too loose. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[FortunaMaximus]

Question.

How significant is the pots won w/o showdown factor here?