Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > MTT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-22-2006, 11:56 AM
 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 226th at 2006 WSOP ME
Posts: 7,806
Default Suited Connectors, Implied Odds, and You (Theory/Math)

Awesome post currently posted in SSNL. Would love to see some of the math minds here (NoahSD, A_Plus, etc.) contribute or even just comment on it.

Certainly thought this could be helpful even in the world of tournaments.

link
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-22-2006, 12:16 PM
zoobird zoobird is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,045
Default Re: Suited Connectors, Implied Odds, and You (Theory/Math)

Anybody on here know what the 5/10 rule that everyone in SSNL seems to use is?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-22-2006, 12:29 PM
InternetJunky InternetJunky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 292
Default Re: Suited Connectors, Implied Odds, and You (Theory/Math)

[ QUOTE ]
Anybody on here know what the 5/10 rule that everyone in SSNL seems to use is?

[/ QUOTE ]
FYI
[ QUOTE ]

Q: I've heard other posters mentioning the 5/10 rule. What is it?

A: The 5/10 rule is an important no-limit concept that first appeared in Bob Ciaffone's excellent book, "PL & NL Poker." To quote directly from the book:

"When contemplating calling a raise because your position is good, you have a clear call if the raise is less than 5% of your stack, and a clear fold if it is more than 10%. In between those numbers, use your judgement."

It's a good rule for calling a preflop raise with a pocket pair in hopes of hitting a set. The driving force behind the concept is the implied odds in a given situation. If you get your set, but the opponent only has 5BBs after the initial raise, calling to hit the set in the first place is incorrect.


[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-22-2006, 12:43 PM
mornelth mornelth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Rand(POG)
Posts: 4,764
Default Good read, TY (no text)

nt
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-22-2006, 01:47 PM
Soulman Soulman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: On the FT bubble
Posts: 3,609
Default Re: Good read, TY (no text)

Thanks for the link, very nice read. Especially for someone new to NL cash (but decent in MTTs/SNGs).
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-22-2006, 02:19 PM
bgoalie35 bgoalie35 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: nitting it up
Posts: 617
Default Re: Good read, TY (no text)

Its probably important to remember the 5/10 rule should apply to the effective stack in play at the time. If the raise is only 5% of your stack, but 50% of your opponent's stack, its not worth it. You make the call for the implied odds of getting the rest of your opponents stack. If the rest of his stack is not enough to merit the call, it doesn't matter how much you have left behind (and if you don't have enough left behind, it doesn't matter how much he has).

Edit: Also, thanks to Kramer for the link, very interesting thread.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-22-2006, 02:55 PM
mornelth mornelth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Rand(POG)
Posts: 4,764
Default Re: Good read, TY (no text)

[ QUOTE ]
Its probably important to remember the 5/10 rule should apply to the effective stack in play at the time. If the raise is only 5% of your stack, but 50% of your opponent's stack, its not worth it. You make the call for the implied odds of getting the rest of your opponents stack. If the rest of his stack is not enough to merit the call, it doesn't matter how much you have left behind (and if you don't have enough left behind, it doesn't matter how much he has).

Edit: Also, thanks to Kramer for the link, very interesting thread.

[/ QUOTE ]

Cliffs Notes ; figure out 5% of the SHORTER of the two stacks...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-22-2006, 03:48 PM
tedtodd tedtodd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: lurking in the german forums
Posts: 2,387
Default Re: Good read, TY (no text)

Thanks Kramer- great read and there's no way I would have spotted this otherwise.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.